CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-06-25

Diagnosing Task Insensitivity in Language Agents

Jingyu Liu, Xiaopeng Wu, Kehan Chen, Chuan Yu, Yong Liu

Large language models can serve as capable long-horizon agents, but their out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization remains weak. We identify a key source of this failure as task insensitivity: when faced with similar but distinct tasks, models might apply patterns learned during training and fail to solve the task at hand. We show that models often continue with actions aligned with the original task even when the instruction is semantically corrupted and cannot be directly answered. We further find that, when we replace the task description in a trained prompt with another similar but distinct task, the model may still output the same action. This behavior is accompanied by a consistent training-time attention drift away from task tokens and toward local observations, suggesting an optimization bias toward shortcuts. To mitigate this problem, we propose Task-Perturbed NLL Optimization, a lightweight contrastive regularizer that explicitly encourages action dependence on the task instruction. Extensive evaluations show that our intervention improves task sensitivity and OOD generalization while preserving more stable attention to task tokens.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-30

ORCA-bench: How Ready Are Language Model Agents for Oncall?

Albert Gong, Kyuseong Choi, Abhineet Agarwal, Jason Schechner, Ryan Huang, Raj Agrawal, et al.

Large language models can write, patch, and search code, but oncall root cause analysis (RCA) demands something different: reasoning over noisy metrics, logs, traces, and source code, starting from ambiguous user-facing reports, often hours after the incident began. We introduce…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-23

Agentic coding without the cloud: evaluating open-weight large language models on longitudinal data preparation tasks

Mack Nixon, Liam Wright, Yevgeniya Kovalchuk, Alison Fang-Wei Wu, Martin Danka, Andy Boyd, et al.

Large language models (LLMs) and agents are now widely used tools in code development, with data typically sent to third-party cloud-based models. Their adoption in research using personal data is constrained by governance requirements that typically prohibit data transmission to…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-24

TRACE-ROUTER: Task-Consistent and Adaptive Online Routing for Agentic AI

Ritik Raj, Souvik Kundu, Sarbartha Banerjee, Dheemanth Joshi, Ishita Vohra, Tushar Krishna

Routing to select large language models (LLMs) with different cost-quality trade-offs has become a fundamental deployment feature of enterprise AI. Existing routers, primarily make independent routing decisions for each LLM call. However, agentic applications execute as long-hori…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-23

Every Model Cheats: Prompt-Level Mitigation of Cheating on Offensive Cyber Tasks

Michael Kouremetis, Ads Dawson, Raja Sekhar Rao Dheekonda, Brian Greunke

Large language model (LLM) agents routinely cheat on cybersecurity benchmarks, inflating reported pass rates far beyond genuine capability. Prior audits of Cybench found cheating in 0.3-3.4% of traces, implicating only a handful of models. We present a controlled prompt-ablation…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.ARcs.CR2026-07-28

ContractHIL-HLS: Contract-Aligned Multi-Agent Workflow with Hardware-in-the-Loop Feedback for HLS Design

Jingbo Zhang, Haoxiang Sun, Wenbo Wang, Wenbo Zhang

This paper presents ContractHIL-HLS, a contract-aligned multi-agent workflow for practical high-level synthesis (HLS) engineering. The workflow makes three contributions. First, it introduces a structured contract as the semantic-alignment and task-execution artifact that transla…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CV2026-07-24

SceneActBench: Can Agents Act on the 3D Scenes They See?

Yifei Zhao, Xiangxin Zhou, Wenhao Yang, Jiaqi Tang, Pu Jian, Huanjin Yao, et al.

Vision-language model (VLM) agents increasingly use tools to act on 3D scenes rather than only describe them. Existing 3D benchmarks score textual responses or single-object operations, leaving agent action on complete multi-object 3D scenes under evaluated. We present SceneActBe…

View free PDFSource page