CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CV2026-07-10

MOSAIC: Adaptive Inter-layer Composition for Efficient Heterogeneous Vision-Language Models

Yuncheng Yang, Feiyang Ye, Shixian Luo, Yinna Zhu, Lianlei Shan, Wangcai Zhao, Kuo Zhang, Yan Chen, Yong Wu, Yan Xie

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved success using homogeneous Transformers to process multimedia data. Recent studies show that heterogeneous structures interleaving efficient mechanisms, like linear attention, improve both performance and inference latency over homogeneous designs. However, these efforts rely on handcrafted static mixing patterns, which are sub-optimal and difficult to adapt to specific hardware. To bridge this gap, we propose Multi-Objective Search for Adaptive Inter-layer Composition (MOSAIC), a hardware-aware search method that automatically transforms homogeneous models into optimized heterogeneous architectures. MOSAIC integrates diverse efficiency mechanisms--including linear, sparse, and low-rank operators--into a unified search space. By formulating the selection as a multi-objective Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) problem, our method identifies optimal configurations that maximize downstream performance under strict hardware latency constraints. To mitigate performance degradation from structural transitions, we introduce a two-stage parameter recovery process: global off-policy distillation to stabilize internal representations, followed by a dual-teacher on-policy distillation leveraging a 235B oracle for knowledge expansion and the original 4B teacher for distributional stability. We validate MOSAIC through MOSAIC-4B, derived from Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct. Results demonstrate that MOSAIC-4B matches the baseline's performance across multiple benchmarks while requiring less than 2% of the original training cost. Furthermore, it substantially improves inference efficiency, achieving 1.76x prefilling and 2.54x decoding speedups.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CV2026-07-17

When Can Test-Time Adaptation Help Zero-Shot CT Vision-Language Models?

Ailar Mahdizadeh, Puria Azadi Moghadam, Xiangteng He, Leonid Sigal

3D CT vision-language models (VLMs) classify abnormalities from text prompts in a zero-shot manner, enabling cross-institution deployment where labels are scarce and clinical tasks shift faster than supervised models can be retrained. A real CT scan, however, typically contains s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-23

When Are Reasoning-Based Guardrails Not Efficient? ResponseGuard: A Fast Vision-Language Guard for Real-Time Moderation

Dongbin Na

A vision-language AI assistant returns its answer as a stream of generated tokens. Therefore, a safety guard that watches that answer has to keep up with the stream and stop a harmful reply before a user reads it. Recent vision-language guardrails instead generate a chain of thou…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.CLcs.CR2026-07-17

One Modality to Forget Them All: Enhancing Cross-Modal Unlearning in Vision-Language Models

Sudharshan Balaji, Yili Ren, Guangjing Wang, Yimin Chen, Ning Wang

Machine unlearning is widely used to remove hazardous knowledge from large language models. Modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs), however, process both text and visual inputs, raising a fundamental security question: does unlearning in one modality transfer to the other? We prese…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-17

Region-Grounded Vision-Language Learning for Detection-Guided Mammographic Lesion Classification

Zhengbo Zhou, Jiren Li, Dooman Arefan, Margarita Zuley, Shandong Wu

Vision-language models trained with contrastive objectives have shown promise in medical image analysis. However, conventional global image-text alignment is ill-suited for mammography, where diagnostically relevant lesions are spatially localized and occupy only a small fraction…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGeess.IV2026-07-17

Ask Twice, Look Twice: Prompt Echoing Resolves the Question-First Paradox in Vision-Language Models

Rakshanda Hassan Abhinandan, John Galeotti, Deva Ramanan, Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare

Where should the question go in a vision-language model (VLM) prompt: before the image or after it? Intuition says before: knowing what is asked should tell the model where to look. Yet across visual question answering benchmarks, question-first prompting consistently underperfor…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGeess.IV2026-07-21

Attributes Should Come from Images, Not Class Names: Distribution-Conditioned Attribute Selection for Vision-Language Models

Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare, Jia Shi, Zhiqiu Lin, Deepak Pathak, John Galeotti, Deva Ramanan

A popular route to interpretable zero-shot classification asks a large language model (LLM) to describe each class name and prompts CLIP with the resulting descriptors. We show that these descriptors carry little visual evidence of their own: removing the class name from the prom…

View free PDFSource page