CORTEXA
← Browse
crossrefWater2026-04-14Cited by 0

Benchmarking Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Groundwater Level Prediction in Karst Aquifers: The Dominant Role of Hydrogeological Complexity

Qingmin Zhu, Yinxia Zhu, Jie Niu, Jinqiang Huang, Fen Huang, Xiangyang Zhou, Dongdong Liu, Bill X. Hu

Karst aquifers present unique challenges for groundwater level prediction due to their dual-porosity structures and highly nonlinear hydrological responses. This study systematically evaluates nine machine learning and deep learning models (RF, XGBoost, LSTM, CNN, Transformer, N-BEATS, CNN-LSTM, Seq2Seq-LSTM, and Attention-Seq2Seq-LSTM) for rainfall-driven groundwater level forecasting in the Maocun subterranean river catchment, Guilin, Guangxi, China. Two years of hourly high-frequency data from three monitoring sites representing distinct hydrogeological zones (recharge, flow, and discharge) were employed within a multidimensional evaluation framework integrating single-step accuracy, multi-step stability, and computational efficiency. Results indicate that the Transformer achieved the highest single-step prediction accuracy, attaining the lowest RMSE (0.130–0.606 m) and highest R2 (0.813–0.965) across all three sites. CNN-LSTM offered the best balance between predictive performance and computational cost, requiring an average training time of only 27.97 s and 28.0 convergence epochs. N-BEATS demonstrated superior long-term stability in 12-steps-ahead forecasting, achieving R2 = 0.914 at ZK1, outperforming all other architectures. More fundamentally, hydrogeological complexity exerted a dominant control on predictive skill that systematically outweighed differences arising from model architecture. All models yielded R2 below 0.813 at the geologically complex ZK2 site, whereas R2 exceeded 0.950 across all models at ZK1, indicating that aquifer complexity, rather than algorithm selection, constitutes the primary constraint on prediction feasibility. This study presents the first application of N-BEATS to karst groundwater level forecasting and proposes a replicable multidimensional evaluation framework, providing a scientific reference for intelligent modelling of complex karst systems.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

crossrefWater2026-07-23

Modelling Shallow Groundwater Level Fluctuations in Very Flat Landscapes Based on Satellite Data and Machine Learning

Javier Houspanossian, Francisco Diez, Raul Rivas, Esteban Jobbagy, Mauro Holzman, Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy

Groundwater level fluctuations play a critical role in shaping hydrological extremes in flat sedimentary landscapes, where shallow water table depth (WTD) and strong surface-subsurface connectivity modulate the impacts of floods and droughts. The Western Pampean Plain (Argentina)…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2022-09-19Cited by 11

Micro-Climate Computed Machine and Deep Learning Models for Prediction of Surface Water Temperature Using Satellite Data in Mundan Water Reservoir

Sabastian Simbarashe Mukonza, Jie-Lun Chiang

Water temperature is an important indicator of water quality for surface water resources because it impacts solubility of dissolved gases in water, affects metabolic rates of aquatic inhabitants, such as fish and harmful algal blooms (HABs), and determines the fate of water resid…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2025-09-10Cited by 6

Deep Signals: Enhancing Bottom Temperature Predictions in Norway’s Mjøsa Lake Through VMD- and EMD-Boosted Machine Learning Models

Sertac Oruc, Mehmet Ali Hınıs, Zeliha Selek, Türker Tuğrul

In this study, we benchmark various machine learning techniques against a synthetic but physically based reference time series (model-simulated (ERA5-Land/FLake) bottom-temperature series) and assess whether decomposition methods (VMD and EMD) improve forecast accuracy using Supp…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2023-06-20Cited by 63

Coupling Machine and Deep Learning with Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Improving Prediction of Groundwater Quality and Decision-Making in Arid Region, Saudi Arabia

Fahad Alshehri, Atiqur Rahman

Recently, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models based on artificial intelligence (AI) have emerged as fast and reliable tools for predicting water quality index (WQI) in various regions worldwide. In this study, we propose a novel stacking framework based on DL mode…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2023-07-13Cited by 218

Advanced Machine Learning Techniques to Improve Hydrological Prediction: A Comparative Analysis of Streamflow Prediction Models

Vijendra Kumar, Naresh Kedam, Kul Vaibhav Sharma, Darshan J. Mehta, Tommaso Caloiero

The management of water resources depends heavily on hydrological prediction, and advances in machine learning (ML) present prospects for improving predictive modelling capabilities. This study investigates the use of a variety of widely used machine learning algorithms, such as…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2024-07-09Cited by 13

Leak and Burst Detection in Water Distribution Network Using Logic- and Machine Learning-Based Approaches

Kiran Joseph, Jyoti Shetty, Ashok K. Sharma, Rudi van Staden, P. L. P. Wasantha, Sharna Small, et al.

Urban water systems worldwide are confronted with the dual challenges of dwindling water resources and deteriorating infrastructure, emphasising the critical need to minimise water losses from leakage. Conventional methods for leak and burst detection often prove inadequate, lead…

View free PDFSource page