CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-01

Coachable agents for interactive gameplay

Roberto Capobianco, Harm van Seijen, Nolan D. Bard, Neil Burch, Fatima Davelouis, Josh Davidson, Alisa Devlic, Yunshu Du, Ishan Durugkar, Siddhant Gangapurwala, Daniel Hernandez, G. Zacharias Holland, Sahil Jain, Kenta Kawamoto, Raksha Kumaraswamy, Patrick MacAlpine, Dustin R. Morrill, Declan Oller, Francesco Riccio, Akanksha Saran, Craig Sherstan, Kaushik Subramanian, Thomas J. Walsh, Samuel Barrett, Kizza N. Frisbee, Mady Govil, Johannes Günther, Varun R. Kompella, James A. MacGlashan, Maxwell Svetlik, Michael D. Thomure, Jaden B. Travnik, Kevin Waugh, Elahe Aghapour, Florian Fuchs, Andreanne Lemay, Shruti Mishra, Takuma Seno, Peter Stone, Michael Spranger, Peter R. Wurman

Reinforcement learning has proven to be a valuable tool in the creation of advanced AI and robotic systems, contributing to everything from game playing to robotics to foundation models. Through trial-and-error, these AI systems typically learn one, near-optimal behavior to solve their tasks. However, there are many use cases in which one would like to assert some level of control, preferably in real time, over how the task is solved. We refer to these modifications of a core task as styles. We combine universal value function approximators (UVFAs) with carefully selected training scenarios, learning algorithms, and data augmentation to create a framework for coaching agents that exhibit styles in complex domains. We demonstrate the framework's application in the AAA video games Horizon Forbidden West and Gran Turismo, and in an open-source humanoid test domain. Despite the different nature of the domains -- car racing, stylized game combat, and humanoid walking -- each agent shows strong coherence to the style requests while still satisfying the main task in its domain. Importantly, the techniques outlined in this paper allow an end user to choose the final behavior at run time, giving them flexible control over the final executed performance.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-10

AppWorld-UL: Benchmarking Diverse Agent-User Interactions for Tool-Use

Junzhi Chen, Harsh Trivedi, Jane Pan, Michael JQ Zhang, Tejas Srinivasan, Niranjan Balasubramanian, et al.

Tool-use agents that address day-to-day digital tasks such as ordering groceries must not only operate applications, but also interact with the user, e.g., to ask clarification questions, prompt for confirmation, and inform the user when the instruction is infeasible. However, cu…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CLstat.ML2026-07-06

Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

Baohao Liao, Hanze Dong, Christof Monz, Xinxing Xu, Li Dong, Furu Wei

We study on-policy distillation (OPD) for agentic tasks, where an LLM agent interacts with an environment over multiple turns and a student imitates a teacher over these multi-turn interaction histories. Fully online OPD is costly because each update requires fresh student rollou…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LGcs.SE2026-07-07

AgentLens: Production-Assessed Trajectory Reviews for Coding Agent Evaluation

Andrey Podivilov, Vadim Lomshakov, Sergey Savin, Matvei Startsev, Roman Pozharskiy, Maksim Parshin, et al.

We present AgentLens, a production-assessed benchmark for interactive code agents. Most code-agent benchmarks reduce a run to a single bit -- did the task pass? -- but the people who actually use these agents experience the entire trajectory: how the agent follows instructions, u…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.ARcs.LG2026-07-20

Can AI Agents Really Complete RTL-to-GDS? Lessons from Benchmarking Tool-Interactive EDA Workflows

Jinyuan Deng, Zhengrui Chen, Xufeng Wei, Tianyu Xing, Chenyi Wen, Qi Sun, et al.

Large language model (LLM) agents are extending electronic design automation (EDA) beyond static RTL generation toward long-horizon, tool-interactive workflows. Yet it remains unclear whether general-purpose coding agents, even with domain-specific EDA skills, can reliably execut…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-09

Persuasion Attacks Can Decrease Effectiveness of CoT Monitoring

Jennifer Za, Julija Bainiaksina, Nikita Ostrovsky, Tanush Chopra, Victoria Krakovna

Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is a promising safety mechanism for AI agents, based on the premise that visible reasoning traces can surface misaligned or deceptive behavior. While effective in standard scenarios, recent work highlights that LLMs remain vulnerable to persuasio…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.GT2026-07-09

Provably Optimal Learning Algorithms for Assistance Games

Nivasini Ananthakrishnan, Mark Bedaywi, Michael I. Jordan, Stuart Russell, Nika Haghtalab

This paper studies an online variant of the assistance games framework, where an informed agent and an uninformed agent repeatedly interact over $T$ timesteps to optimize a common reward function. While the informed agent (the human) observes a latent state of the world, the unin…

View free PDFSource page