CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-10

Neuro-Agentic Control: A Deep Learning-based LLM-Powered Agentic AI Framework for Controlling Security Controls

Saroj Gopali, Bipin Chhetri, Deepika Giri, Sima Siami-Namini, Akbar Siami Namin

Cyberattacks on operational technology are increasingly causing costly downtime and physical damage, exposing the limitations of traditional rule-based monitoring in industrial IoT environments. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have strong semantic reasoning abilities to assist in decision support, their hallucinatory nature presents unacceptable safety liabilities for closed-loop control. This paper introduces a neuro-agentic control framework, a novel architecture that couples an LLM-based planner (i.e., such as Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite) with a pre-trained Time-Series Foundation Model (TimesFM), to achieve physics-grounded autonomous defense. The paper introduces a ``Counterfactual Physics Injection'' mechanism that simulates the impact of LLM-proposed interventions within the numerical latent space of the foundation model before actuation, while allowing the system to reject hallucinatory or unsafe actions. Evaluated on an industrial dataset (e.g., the Secure Water Treatment (SWaT)) in the context of stochastic attack scenarios, the framework exhibited better performance compared to LSTM and TCN baselines. The Neuro-Agentic Loop prevented five breaches (33.3%) below the threshold versus LSTM (26.7%) and TCN (13.3%), with zero physically invalid (hallucinated) actions executed. These results demonstrate the efficacy of using foundation models as deterministic ``Sentinels'' to safeguard agentic AI in critical infrastructure.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.DLcs.AI2026-07-23

From Static Bibliometrics to Dynamic Knowledge Graphs: An LLM-Powered Framework for Modernizing Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) Analytics

Muhsen Hammoud

Bibliometric indicators - citation counts, h-indexes, co-authorship networks - have long anchored science, technology, and innovation (STI) analytics, yet suffer from temporal lag, semantic shallowness, and an inability to capture the non-linear dynamics of contemporary knowledge…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CV2026-07-23

EmoAgent-R1: Towards Multimodal Emotion Understanding with Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Agent Specialization

Lihuang Fang, Yuchen Zou, kebin Jin, Jinghui Qin

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive performance in multimodal emotion recognition (MER) tasks and lifted MER to a new level that is complex emotion understanding with advanced video understanding abilities and natural language description. However, e…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.DBcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-24

DBA-Bench: A Production-Fidelity Benchmark for LLM-Based Database Operations Agents

Junming Chen, Junyang Jiang, Xu Chen, Zibo Liang, Kai Zheng

LLM-based database agents show promise, but differing task scopes, testbeds, and metrics hinder comparison. We identify four gaps between evaluation and production operations: live-environment fidelity (multi-turn read-write interaction with a running database); observation-space…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.NIcs.AI2026-07-24

A Self-Calibrating Agentic AI Framework for Autonomous Edge Resource Allocation

Fin Gentzen, Marla Grunewald, Iulisloi Zacarias, Mounir Bensalem, Admela Jukan

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, transitioning from static conversational interfaces to dynamic systems capable of complex reasoning, tool execution, and decision-making. However, the operational reliability of these agentic AI systems…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-23

Toward cryptographically verifiable authorization for autonomous AI agents: A security hypothesis, preliminary formal model, and proof-of-concept implementation

M. Llambí-Morillas, D. Fernández-Fernández

Autonomous AI agents increasingly execute actions, invoke tools, and operate on protected resources with limited human oversight. Existing authentication and authorization mechanisms establish identity and delegate authority, but do not inherently provide cryptographic evidence t…

View free PDFSource page