CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.CL2026-07-21

HindsightBench: A Black-Box Behavioral Audit Protocol for Parametric Hindsight in Time-Indexed LLM Decision Tasks

Haozhe Jia

Large language models leak parametric knowledge of realized outcomes into historical financial decision tasks. Existence is settled; what users lack is a cheap way to audit a given model for it. We present HindsightBench, a black-box behavioral audit protocol that profiles parametric hindsight in any time-indexed LLM decision task at probe-level cost (no backtests, no logprobs, no corpus access). The protocol chains a four-arm date-manipulation matrix (revealed/date-only/masked/transplanted), dual memory probes (date recovery; outcome recall), and six per-model metrics -- trigger strength, transplant effect, post-cutoff placebo, recoverability, behaviorally effective knowledge cutoff, and a recall-accuracy dissociation coefficient -- with explicit gates where identifiability is data-dependent. Applying it to 15 models from seven vendors on a 258-node vintage-correct macro panel yields three headline patterns: (i) the date-trigger reflex tracks training generation, not scale -- absent across the 2024 open-weight generation from 1B to 70B, present in every tested 2026-generation model, and switching on within one vendor lineage (Qwen3 -> Qwen3.6) at fixed MoE architecture and 3B active parameters; (ii) effective cutoffs span 22 months across vendors and precede vendor-reported dates by up to eight months, invalidating calendar-window placebo designs; (iii) audit results are not invariant to serving -- BF16 serving of an FP8-referenced model breaks the trigger estimate's stability while AWQ-INT4 preserves it, and a provider-locked reasoning regime makes one probe non-convergent -- so the protocol ships with operational requirements (pin quantization and thinking regime; disclose parser and sampling policy). We release the panel, frozen preregistrations, per-model audit rows with measured dollar costs, transcripts, and one-command regeneration.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-31

PTP: Previous-Token Prediction based LLM Inversion for Near-Exact Prompt Reconstruction

Pirzada Suhail, Nagasai Saketh Naidu, Atanu R Sinha, Amit Sethi

Large language models (LLMs) generate text by auto-regressively sampling the next token. This inherently leads to a many-to-many mapping between prompts and responses, complicating the task of inferring prompts from observed outputs. Prior work on LLM inversion frames prompt reco…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-31

CalibratedRubric: Task-Adaptive Rubric Banks for Open-Ended LLM Evaluation

Mengting Chen, Yanshu Sun, Wanting Liang, Beidi Luan, Rui Sun, Dezhi Chen, et al.

Reliable evaluation of open-ended LLM outputs requires fine-grained rubrics, yet expert curation is costly and difficult to scale. Existing automated pipelines rely on strict judge unanimity and binary variance filters, which cannot distinguish measurable rubrics from informative…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-23

Training Large Language Models for Self-Explanation Faithfulness

Yeoktatt Cheah, María Pérez-Ortiz, Noah Y. Siegel, Oana-Maria Camburu

We propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL) method to directly optimize the faithfulness of self-explanations - the extent to which a model's generated reasoning accurately reflects its internal decision-making process. While existing work focuses on evaluating faithfulness or using…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-23

Adversarial Prompts for Acceptance Collapse in Speculative Decoding

Run Wang, Chaoyi Zhou, Xi Liu, Yi Zhu, Amir Salarpour, Pedram MohajerAnsari, et al.

Lossless acceleration schemes, such as speculative decoding, promise significant inference speedups by relying on dynamic token-level alignment between a draft and a target model. However, this guarantee of semantic equivalence masks a severe operational vulnerability: draft-targ…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.DBcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-24

DBA-Bench: A Production-Fidelity Benchmark for LLM-Based Database Operations Agents

Junming Chen, Junyang Jiang, Xu Chen, Zibo Liang, Kai Zheng

LLM-based database agents show promise, but differing task scopes, testbeds, and metrics hinder comparison. We identify four gaps between evaluation and production operations: live-environment fidelity (multi-turn read-write interaction with a running database); observation-space…

View free PDFSource page