CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-08

Aligning Clinical Needs and AI Capabilities: A Survey on LLMs for Medical Reasoning

Qi Peng, Jiatong Li, Sirui Huang, Yiyang Jiang, Kaisong Gong, Ronger Ding, Shijie Ye, Changmeng Zheng, Yi Cai, Xiaobo Yang, Jin Huang, Xiao-Yong Wei, Qing Li

Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as important tools in healthcare, showing growing potential for clinical reasoning and patient care. This survey examines recent progress in medical LLMs, focusing on reasoning applications and requirements. We present a dual-view approach that connects clinical practice with computational methods. On the clinical side, we establish a five-level competency scheme following Miller's Pyramid, progressing from knowledge recall to dynamic case management. On the computational side, we link deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning patterns to common medical goals and tasks. We also introduce a benchmark dataset spanning five levels of medical reasoning capability and report results on 18 state-of-the-art models, revealing that medical specialist models excel in diagnosis-centric tasks while general models lead in decision support and dialogue. We conclude by discussing current progress and open challenges, including data limitations, hallucination, and grounding issues, and outline directions toward safer, more reliable, and workflow-ready systems.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-24

Dynamic Capability Scoping for Enterprise AI Agents: A Synthetic Dataset and Three-Source Permission Architecture

Halil Burak Noyan

Enterprise AI agents are typically granted static credential sets at configuration time, holding every tool the role might need for every task they perform. This persistent over-privilege expands the attack surface. We argue that capability scoping must follow a dynamic least-pri…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-24

Semiotic logical hexagon theory for LLM logical reasoning

Yunyao Zhang, Xinglang Zhang, Zeliang Chen, Junqing Yu, Zikai Song

Large language models (LLMs) have become powerful tools for language understanding and logical reasoning. However, they still make mistakes when a problem requires both understanding meaning and following logic. A key reason is that natural-language statements often carry implici…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.ETcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-23

The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation

Fares Fourati, Hinrich Schütze, Eyke Hüllermeier, Iryna Gurevych

The rapid progress of AI has intensified the long-standing pursuit of automation: replacing human participation with algorithms wherever possible. Implicit in this pursuit is the assumption that humans remain in the loop only because current AI systems are not yet sufficiently ca…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LOcs.AIcs.ET2026-07-23

Scaling Up Formal Representation of Clinical Trial Protocols in Ensemble Logic Using LLMs: A Preliminary Study

Yan Huang, Xubing Hao, Xiaojin Li, Rashmie Abeysinghe, Xiaoqian Jiang, Licong Cui, et al.

The reliance on unstructured free text for documenting clinical trial protocols creates a significant barrier to automated reasoning, cohort discovery, and trial simulation. The lack of formal structure obscures critical temporal phenotypes, such as dynamic eligibility criteria a…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-24

A Roadmap to Impactful Pluralistic Alignment Research

Elinor Poole-Dayan, Jillian Fisher, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Jacob Andreas, Mitchell Gordon, Michiel A. Bakker

Pluralistic value alignment---the goal of building AI systems that represent and serve diverse human values and perspectives---has emerged as an active research agenda. Yet, there's no public evidence that it has shaped the training or evaluation of the AI systems people actually…

View free PDFSource page