CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGq-fin.RM2026-07-15

A Noise-Robust Elicit-to-Optimize Framework for Distortion Riskmetrics via Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Yang Liu, Yuhao Liu, Yunran Wei

We propose a noise-robust elicit-to-optimize framework that integrates inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) and reinforcement learning (RL) for eliciting agents' risk preferences and optimizing policies under a broad class of risk objectives characterized by distortion riskmetrics. On the elicitation side, we propose an adaptive Bayesian IRL method that infers agents' latent risk objectives from their noisy observed decisions, explicitly allowing agents to take stochastic and suboptimal actions. We establish the existence of a finite set of distinguishing questions that identifies the preferred distortion riskmetric within the candidate class and prove that the convergence rate of the algorithm is of order $O(\exp(-cm+O(\sqrt{m\log m})))$ under general settings, where $c>0$ is a constant and $m$ denotes the number of algorithm iterations. On the optimization side, we develop a model-free RL algorithm for optimizing policies under conditional distortion riskmetrics. By representing the objective as an integral of the conditional cost quantile function with respect to the distortion function, the method unifies distortion-riskmetric objectives. We optimize diverse risk objectives by extending the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm with policy, value, and quantile neural networks, where the quantile network estimates the full conditional cost quantile function and enables numerical evaluation of general risk objectives. A comprehensive empirical study demonstrates the framework's elicitation accuracy and effectiveness in complex financial environments.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIq-fin.RM2026-07-12

Diachronic Sample Integration: Robust Tail-Risk Estimation with Generative Models

Shuning Zhao, Patrick Wong, Leran Zhang, Xiaolin Hu

Deep generative models are increasingly used as simulators for downstream decision-making under data scarcity, but in risk-sensitive applications their usefulness depends on rare adverse scenarios rather than typical samples. Standard generative objectives prioritize bulk distrib…

View free PDFSource page
arxivq-fin.RMcs.LG2026-07-06

SHARC: SHAP-Based Interpretability in Machine Learning Risk Models for Regulatory Capital under ICAAP and CCAR

Ujjwala Vadrevu

The adoption of non-parametric machine learning models for regulatory capital estimation introduces a fundamental governance challenge: the inability to explain model outputs in a manner auditable by supervisory bodies. This 'black box' problem remains a major barrier to the adop…

View free PDFSource page
arxivecon.EMcs.LGq-fin.CPq-fin.RMstat.ML2026-06-27

Liquidity-Based Audit of Algorithmic Trading Strategies

Irene Aldridge

We show that net demand for liquidity by algo strategies is identifiable from its trade and price history alone, with no knowledge of its signal or optimization problem. An exact multi-period regret decomposition implies that the sign of this statistic classifies a linear strateg…

View free PDFSource page
arxivq-fin.RMcs.LG2026-07-05

Governing Generative AI Across Financial Institutions: A Framework for Generative AI Risk Control

Dennis Mao, Alessandra Lin, Yixin Kang, Yiqing Wang

Generative artificial intelligence is moving from general-purpose experimentation toward specialized applications across banking, capital markets, insurance, payments, and wealth management. Its main contribution is not limited to conversational interfaces. Modern generative syst…

View free PDFSource page