CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CV2026-07-01

Personalized Object Identification and Localization via In-Context Inference with Vision-Language Models

Kensuke Nakamura, Byung-Woo Hong

Personalized object localization (POL) localizes an object instance in a query image based on a few reference images with bounding-box annotations and a target object label. The pioneering method, IPLoc, solves this task through in-context inference with vision-language models (VLMs). However, it assumes that the query image always contains the target object. This assumption severely limits its applicability to real-world scenarios with many irrelevant images. To address this issue, we formulate a new task, personalized object identification and localization (POIL), by positioning POL within the broader few-shot object detection framework. POIL aims to localize the target object instance while rejecting query images that do not contain the reference object instance. We also present POIL datasets constructed from public sources. We further propose an in-context algorithm named IPLoc-ID for solving POIL with VLMs. IPLoc-ID first predicts a candidate bounding box and then determines whether it corresponds to the reference object instance. We introduce a self-posed query to connect these two steps within a single autoregressive generation framework. Through ablation studies and comprehensive experiments, we show that IPLoc-ID substantially suppresses false-positive detections on negative query images while maintaining localization performance comparable to IPLoc. Overall, IPLoc-ID effectively addresses the practical instance-level POIL task, which cannot be sufficiently solved by conventional object detection, few-shot object detection, or the localization-only IPLoc method.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGeess.IV2026-07-17

Ask Twice, Look Twice: Prompt Echoing Resolves the Question-First Paradox in Vision-Language Models

Rakshanda Hassan Abhinandan, John Galeotti, Deva Ramanan, Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare

Where should the question go in a vision-language model (VLM) prompt: before the image or after it? Intuition says before: knowing what is asked should tell the model where to look. Yet across visual question answering benchmarks, question-first prompting consistently underperfor…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-23

When Are Reasoning-Based Guardrails Not Efficient? ResponseGuard: A Fast Vision-Language Guard for Real-Time Moderation

Dongbin Na

A vision-language AI assistant returns its answer as a stream of generated tokens. Therefore, a safety guard that watches that answer has to keep up with the stream and stop a harmful reply before a user reads it. Recent vision-language guardrails instead generate a chain of thou…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.CLcs.CR2026-07-17

One Modality to Forget Them All: Enhancing Cross-Modal Unlearning in Vision-Language Models

Sudharshan Balaji, Yili Ren, Guangjing Wang, Yimin Chen, Ning Wang

Machine unlearning is widely used to remove hazardous knowledge from large language models. Modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs), however, process both text and visual inputs, raising a fundamental security question: does unlearning in one modality transfer to the other? We prese…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-17

Region-Grounded Vision-Language Learning for Detection-Guided Mammographic Lesion Classification

Zhengbo Zhou, Jiren Li, Dooman Arefan, Margarita Zuley, Shandong Wu

Vision-language models trained with contrastive objectives have shown promise in medical image analysis. However, conventional global image-text alignment is ill-suited for mammography, where diagnostically relevant lesions are spatially localized and occupy only a small fraction…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-17

When Can Test-Time Adaptation Help Zero-Shot CT Vision-Language Models?

Ailar Mahdizadeh, Puria Azadi Moghadam, Xiangteng He, Leonid Sigal

3D CT vision-language models (VLMs) classify abnormalities from text prompts in a zero-shot manner, enabling cross-institution deployment where labels are scarce and clinical tasks shift faster than supervised models can be retrained. A real CT scan, however, typically contains s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGeess.IV2026-07-21

Attributes Should Come from Images, Not Class Names: Distribution-Conditioned Attribute Selection for Vision-Language Models

Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare, Jia Shi, Zhiqiu Lin, Deepak Pathak, John Galeotti, Deva Ramanan

A popular route to interpretable zero-shot classification asks a large language model (LLM) to describe each class name and prompts CLIP with the resulting descriptors. We show that these descriptors carry little visual evidence of their own: removing the class name from the prom…

View free PDFSource page