CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-02

Separating Expert Retention from Autonomous Source Inference in Raw-ECG-Replay-Free Continual ECG Deployment

Yufan Lu, Xinhui Liu, Chenyang Xu, Yuxi Zhou, Hao Wang

In multi-source ECG deployment, models may need to incorporate new data sources when earlier raw ECGs cannot be retained or replayed. Freezing a pretrained backbone and assigning each source an isolated classifier prevents parameter interference, but deployment still requires selecting an expert when source metadata are unavailable. We study this distinction through IRFE-ECG, an incremental expert bank built on frozen 1024-dimensional ECGFounder features. Each arriving domain adds a balanced-softmax linear expert, while a lightweight router is fitted only on retained training features and domain labels from sources observed so far. A validation-calibrated margin rule fuses the two most likely experts instead of committing to a single routed expert. On CPSC, PTB-XL, Georgia, and Chapman-Shaoxing, source-aware expert selection reaches $0.7915\pm0.0036$ Macro-F1 and a matched offline independent-head reference reaches $0.7885\pm0.0009$, supporting strong source-aware expert retention. Without source IDs, an MLP router reaches $0.7756\pm0.0027$ and top-2 margin fusion reaches $0.7782\pm0.0022$. The top-2 gain over hard MLP routing is small ($+0.0026$), with a 95\% confidence interval from paired bootstrap that includes zero. Across three domain orders, the top-2-to-oracle gap remains $0.0111$--$0.0133$, identifying autonomous source inference as the main remaining bottleneck. No raw ECGs are replayed, but frozen training features are retained for router updates; the method is therefore not memory-free.Code is available at https://github.com/yufanlu221/IRFE-ECG.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AI2026-07-24

Learning on the Job: Continual Learning from Deployment Feedback for Frozen-Weights Agents

Valentin Tablan, Scott Taylor, Kristoffer Bernhem

AI agents encounter learning opportunities in every episode they run, and discard nearly all of them: the underlying models are frozen at deployment, so an agent that resolves a difficult request today starts from zero when it recurs tomorrow. Yet ordinary operation already produ…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-24

FSE: Continual Learning for Named Entity Recognition by Fast-Slow Experts

Yunan Zhang, Yang Fan, Heng Li, Xiangping Wu, Qingcai Chen

Continual Learning for Named Entity Recognition (CLNER) enable models to incrementally learn new entity types without forgetting previously acquired ones. However, existing methods suffer from catastrophic forgetting and insufficient exploitation of shared information across task…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-31

Self-Play Meets Skill Evolution: Self-Evolving Search Agents that Pose, Solve, and Remember

Zenghuang Fu, Zhaoyang Li, Qiuyuan Ai, Haoyu Wu, Minghui Wu, Chenxu Zhao, et al.

Self-play agents can generate training problems without questions from target benchmarks, but their curricula lack persistent state: failures affect gradients yet do not explicitly shape future practice. External skill memories preserve procedural experience but are typically lea…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.NIcs.AI2026-07-24

A Self-Calibrating Agentic AI Framework for Autonomous Edge Resource Allocation

Fin Gentzen, Marla Grunewald, Iulisloi Zacarias, Mounir Bensalem, Admela Jukan

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, transitioning from static conversational interfaces to dynamic systems capable of complex reasoning, tool execution, and decision-making. However, the operational reliability of these agentic AI systems…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-23

LeAct: Learning to Reason from Expert Actions

Ziran Yang, Chengshuai Shi, Raj Ghugare, Benjamin Eysenbach, Karthik Narasimhan, Chi Jin

Modern reasoning models depend on reasoning data, today sourced from human annotations or distilled from stronger LLMs. However, a rich and largely untapped source of supervision lies in expert systems (e.g., game engines, classical planners, theorem provers), which routinely pro…

View free PDFSource page