CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CV2026-07-14

Rank-1 Identity Consensus Predicts Gallery Enrollment in 1:N Face Matching More Accurately than Score Thresholding

Gabriella Pangelinan, Aman Bhatta, Michael C. King, Kevin W. Bowyer

In operational 1:N face identification, a crucial question arises for each probe: is this person enrolled in the gallery or not? The stakes are high and asymmetric. Rejecting a mate-present (MP) probe loses a valid lead; accepting a mate-absent (MA) probe makes every returned candidate a false identification, at worst a wrongful arrest. Most approaches threshold match scores, but scores shift substantially with image quality and gallery size and composition, making thresholds fixed before deployment brittle under realistic conditions. Our prior work introduced 1-consistency, the only method based on rank consensus across multiple independently trained matchers: a probe is labeled MP if all matchers return the same rank-1 identity. This work stress-tests 1-consistency across 36 (gallery, probe quality) scenarios spanning four quality levels and two structural axes: images per identity and total enrolled identities. We benchmark against two score-thresholding methods that bracket what any deployed threshold could achieve. Fixed Score-Thresholding (FST), calibrated once on baseline conditions, collapses asymmetrically as quality degrades: MP recall falls below 2% while MA recall holds near 100%. Oracle Score-Thresholding (OST), re-tuned per scenario, is the best any threshold could theoretically do, yet for degraded probes 1-consistency matches it with zero tuning. The two differ mainly in error type (OST favors MP recall, 1-consistency favors MA recall), but on one axis 1-consistency does not merely match the oracle: when it labels a probe MP, it returns the correct mate 97-100% of the time versus OST's 66-84% under severe degradation. In short, 1-consistency delivers oracle-level accuracy without the impossible requirement: it sets no threshold, so it needs no advance knowledge of the conditions a probe will arrive in, which is what makes it usable.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CV2026-07-23

What Happens to Accuracy When Photo Lineups Contain Non-Mated Rank-One Images From Large Galleries?

Genesis Argueta, Kevin W. Bowyer, Michael King, Jayeeta Dhar

One-to-many facial identification is commonly used to match a probe image from surveillance video against a gallery of driver's licenses and/or booking photos. The algorithm's rank-one image from the gallery, or a human examiner's selection from the algorithm's top-ranked images,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-23

Adaptive Identity Anchoring: Closed-Loop Keyframe Placement for Synthetic Paired Supervision in Video Face Swapping

Logan Robbins

Video face swapping has no natural paired supervision: no real footage exists of one person's face performing another person's video. The strongest current answer, DreamID-V's SyncID-Pipe, mints pairs by replacing the identity in exactly two frames of a real clip -- the first and…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CRcs.CVstat.ML2026-07-23

Self-Poisoning in Adaptive Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Sharp-Threshold Theory and Certified Label-Free Calibration

Vishnu Bindu Balachandran

Test-time adaptive out-of-distribution (OOD) detectors update a memory bank from the unlabelled stream. We show this adaptation obeys a provable dynamical law. Modelling bank impurity as a generalized Pólya urn, we prove almost-sure convergence to a mean-field equilibrium whose s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-23

GroupVideo: Multi-Identity Customized Text-to-Video Generation

Xinyang Song, Libin Wang, Jianxin Sun, Qi Li, Dandan Zheng, JingDong Chen, et al.

Current identity customized video generation methodologies are predominantly limited to single-identity scenarios, as the lack of explicit identity separation mechanisms often leads to identity confusion in multi-identity settings. Existing multi-identity approaches, which direct…

View free PDFSource page