CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-15

Multi-Agent Collaborative Reasoning with Tool-Augmented Evidence for Urban Region Profiling

Xixuan Hao, Yutian Jiang, Jiabo Liu, Yihang Yang, Guangyin Jin, Song Gao, Yuxuan Liang

Urban region profiling constitutes a core problem in urban computing, supporting applications such as population estimation, economic assessment, and environmental monitoring. Existing methods typically formulate this task as multimodal representation learning, fusing heterogeneous urban data, e.g., satellite imagery, points of interest, textual descriptions, and 3D building information, into latent embeddings for prediction. However, these approaches are largely correlation-driven, assume cross-modal consistency, and rely on static pipelines, which limit their robustness in heterogeneous or unseen urban regions. We propose UrbanAgent, an agentic framework that reframes urban region profiling as a reasoning-driven inference problem. UrbanAgent instantiates an independent agent for each data modality and performs structured multi-agent collaborative reasoning to explicitly address cross-modal inconsistencies rather than absorbing them into a single representation. In addition, UrbanAgent extends indicator prediction as a closed-loop process of active evidence acquisition and iterative reasoning, enabling agents to verify uncertain inferences through tool-augmented retrieval of external knowledge optimized via reinforcement learning. Extensive experiments on global urban datasets for Carbon emissions, GDP, and Population estimation show that UrbanAgent consistently outperforms existing baselines, achieving an average improvement of 8.1% in R2, and exhibiting strong generalization performance in unseen-city settings.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AI2026-07-16

Precise but Uncoupled: Reviewer Precision Does Not Guarantee Critique Uptake in Multi-Agent Math Reasoning

Chih-Hsuan Yang, Jingyan Jiang, Vikram Vasudevan, Cheng-Hau Yang, Huihuo Zheng, Le Chen, et al.

Many math- and science-oriented agent systems use hierarchical designs with specialized reviewer roles, assuming that a dedicated review stage should help turn wrong candidates into correct ones. We test this assumption on 4,181 verifier-grounded Omni-MATH problems using matched…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-10

L-MAD: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Agent Debate Structures in Legal Reasoning

Tan-Minh Nguyen, Hoang-Trung Nguyen, Huu-Dong Nguyen, Dinh-Truong Do, Thi-Hai-Yen Vuong, Le-Minh Nguyen

While multi-agent debate (MAD) frameworks have shown significant potential in general reasoning, their effectiveness in highly structured, knowledge-heavy legal domains remains under-explored. In this work, we introduce the Legal Multi-Agent Debate (L-MAD) framework to systematic…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.MAcs.AI2026-07-21

Strategy-Following Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Considering Control Strategies Provided to Other Agents

Yamato Takahagi, Gentoku Nakasone, Yoshinari Motokawa, Toshiharu Sugawara

This study proposes a learning method for multi-agent systems that allows agents to be controlled through human manager instructions after learning and enables uninstructed agents to implicitly complement the overall work based on the actions of other agents. Multi-agent applicat…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.ETcs.MA2026-07-17

AgentFAIR: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for FAIRness Evaluation of Geospatial Datasets

Ming Chen, Pranav Pai

Geospatial datasets support applications from urban planning to climate modeling, yet consistent assessment of FAIR compliance is difficult. Existing evaluators use different rubrics and evidence sources and may fail on JavaScript-rendered pages or repository-specific identifiers…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-20

ChannelGuard: Safe Models Do Not Compose into Safe Multi-Agent Systems

Elias Hossain, Md Mehedi Hasan Nipu, Fatema Tuj Johora Faria, Tasfia Nuzhat Ornee, Maleeha Sheikh

Multi-agent LLM applications chain a planner, worker agents, a verifier, and a synthesizer, and every hop between agents is an unmonitored channel through which an adversary can smuggle instructions. Existing defenses guard only the input boundary (IBProtector, Llama Guard, perpl…

View free PDFSource page