CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-03

AnchorVLA: Bridging Discrete Decisions and Continuous Trajectories for Vision-Language-Action Planning

Qi Liu, Yabei Li, Hongsong Wang, Heng Zhang, Lei He

Autonomous driving planning requires translating navigation intent, traffic rules, dynamic interactions, and language instructions into executable continuous trajectories. Vision-Language-Action models have been introduced into driving planning to improve long-tail generalization, commonsense reasoning, high-level semantic understanding, and explainability. However, existing VLA planners mainly follow planning-head-based trajectory prediction or full-trajectory autoregressive generation. The former only weakly constrains continuous trajectory generation with VLA reasoning, while the latter relies on long sequences of low-information-density coordinate tokens, making semantic-action alignment difficult and leading to discretization errors and inefficient inference. To address these limitations, we propose AnchorVLA, a hierarchical decision-anchored VLA planning framework that uses trajectory-pattern anchors as an explicit interface between high-level VLA reasoning and continuous trajectory execution. Specifically, Decision-as-Anchor Representation represents behavior-level driving decisions with anchor tokens, each encoding an entire local motion pattern rather than a single coordinate point. Decision-Anchored Residual Flow then generates fine-grained continuous trajectories in the selected anchor-defined residual space, capturing multi-modal execution refinements after high-level decision making. By reasoning over compact and semantically meaningful anchors instead of autoregressively generating waypoint sequences, AnchorVLA preserves LLM-based decision making while improving inference efficiency, semantic-action alignment, and continuous generation flexibility. Experiments on the Bench2Drive closed-loop benchmark show that AnchorVLA achieves a state-of-the-art Success Rate of 77.28 and a competitive Driving Score of 89.92.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO2026-07-18

What Do They See? Interpreting Complex Road Scenarios Through the Eyes of Vision-Language-Action Models for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Vehicle Learning

Kalpana Panda, Wesley Maia, Vinti Agarwal, Ross Greer

End-to-end autonomous driving models are now able to navigate complex road scenarios, mapping raw sensor observations directly to observed paths for open-loop evaluation and often effective driving in closed-loop evaluation. Yet the internal logic of these safety-critical systems…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-13

See like a Robot: Robot-Centric Pointmaps for Vision-Language-Action Models

Byungkun Lee, Dongyoon Hwang, Dongjin Kim, Hojoon Lee, Minho Park, Jaegul Choo

Vision-language-action (VLA) models predict robot actions from visual observations and language instructions. These actions are defined in the robot's own 3D coordinate frame, yet most VLAs observe the scene in the camera frame, creating a frame mismatch between where the scene i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-17

Think at 5 Hz, Act at 20 Hz: Asynchronous Fast-Slow Vision-Language-Action Inference for Closed-Loop Driving

Yun Li, Jiachen Gong, Simon Thompson, Ehsan Javanmardi, Qunli Zhang, Zifan Zeng, et al.

Large language models bring instruction following and scene reasoning to end-to-end driving, but their inference latency collides with the control rate a vehicle requires. Existing closed-loop agents hide this gap by invoking the model on alternate simulation ticks and replaying…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-20

Reasoning as a Double-Edged Sword: Architecture and Cross-Stage Robustness in Vision-Language-Action Models

Tuan Duong Trinh, Naveed Akhtar, Basim Azam

Does adding a reasoning step make a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model more robust to perturbation? Intuitively, a policy that reasons before acting should absorb a perturbed input better than one that maps observations directly to actions. We test this premise head-on across thr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CVcs.RO2026-07-16

Action QFormer: Structured Representation Shaping under Action Supervision in Vision-Language-Action Models

Yufeng Ji, Wenhao Tang, Haoyi Niu, Koushil Sreenath, Yi Wu, Zhongyu Li

Action supervision in vision-language-action (VLA) models is often treated as a downstream objective for learning action prediction. In this paper, we study it instead as a force that shapes inherited multimodal representations. We show that this shaping has a dual effect: it is…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AI2026-07-11

ActiveFly-Bench: Aligning Embodied Question Answering with Vision-Language-Action for Aerial Embodied Perception

Weichen Zhang, Shiquan Yu, Yinan Zhu, Peizhi Tang, Shilong Ji, Zhiyuan Deng, et al.

We introduce ActiveFly-Bench, the first benchmark to bridge cyberspace reasoning and physical-world interaction for UAV embodied perception. The benchmark decomposes active perception into three hierarchical tasks: Aerial Embodied Question Answering (Air-EQA), Observation Behavio…

View free PDFSource page