CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.RO2026-06-30

UniTacVLA: Unified Tactile Understanding and Prediction in Vision Language Action Models

Xidong Zhang, Yichi Zhang, Jiaxin Shi, Fucai Zhu, Siyu Zhu, Michael Yu Wang, Xiaojun Wu, Weihao Yuan

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have achieved strong performance in many robotic manipulation tasks, yet remain limited in contact-rich dexterous manipulation. To overcome this limitation, recent vision-tactile-language-action (VTLA) methods incorporate tactile sensing into VLA models to provide direct contact information. However, they typically treat tactile signals as passive auxiliary inputs, making it difficult to model tactile semantics and future physical interactions. To this end, we propose a unified tactile learning framework for contact-rich manipulation that models tactile signals as dynamic interaction cues for both contact understanding and prediction. Specifically, we construct a unified tactile latent space and jointly model current tactile states and future contact changes through tactile chain-of-thought reasoning and coarse-to-fine future tactile prediction, thereby forming a state-aware and dynamics-aware tactile prior. Based on this prior, we introduce a tactile-action mixed controller that combines real-time and predicted tactile feedback to refine low-frequency action chunks with high-frequency corrections. Real-world experiments on four categories of contact-rich tasks, including adjustment, insertion, wiping, and assembly, under both clean and externally perturbed settings, show that our method improves success rate, manipulation accuracy, and contact robustness over existing methods, demonstrating its effectiveness in dexterous physical interaction.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.RO2026-07-20

STeP: Signal Temporal Logic for Precise Specifications for Action Generation with Vision Language Models

Kasra Torshizi, Anukriti Singh, Sidharth Mathur, Khuzema Habib, Leo Du, Pratap Tokekar

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have shown impressive generalization, but often lack interpretability and can struggle to follow precise natural language instructions that encode spatial, temporal, and logical requirements. We propose a hierarchical framework that uses Signal…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.RO2026-07-20

FM-VLA: Force-based Memory for Vision-Language-Action Models in Contact-Rich Manipulation

Ruicheng Li, Qixiu Li, Ruichun Ma, Yu Deng, Lin Luo, Zhiying Du, et al.

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have achieved impressive generalization in robotic manipulation, and recent memory-augmented VLAs have relaxed the Markovian assumption by conditioning on past images or language summaries. Vision-based memory approaches address this by conditi…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.CV2026-07-31

FibVLA: An Efficient Temporal Vision-Language-Action Model with Fibonacci Sampling

Li Lin, Wujun Xu, Weiwei Meng, Kaiwen Xia, Kang Hao Cheong, Shuai Wang

Vision-language-action models (VLAs), which leverage the cognition of multimodal information to infer physical-world actions, provide a generalized solution for embodied AI applications. Conventional VLAs usually concentrate on current digital cognition. While some efforts are ma…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.CLcs.CV2026-07-31

WCM: A World Critic Model for Vision-Language-Action Reinforcement Learning

Senyu Fei, Xiaopeng Yu, Siyin Wang, Xianzhong Zhao, Jingjing Gong, Xipeng Qiu

Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models has shown strong promise for robotic manipulation. Among RL methods, critic-based approaches rely on a value estimator that predominantly operates on single-frame observations or single-frame VLM bac…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG2026-07-20

Reasoning as a Double-Edged Sword: Architecture and Cross-Stage Robustness in Vision-Language-Action Models

Tuan Duong Trinh, Naveed Akhtar, Basim Azam

Does adding a reasoning step make a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model more robust to perturbation? Intuitively, a policy that reasons before acting should absorb a perturbed input better than one that maps observations directly to actions. We test this premise head-on across thr…

View free PDFSource page