CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-05

Auto: The AGI Compiler

Jaber Jaber, Osama Jaber

Every LLM agent run re-derives its behavior token by token on a frontier model: brilliant, expensive, slow, and unbounded. We present Auto, a compiler that records live agent behavior, measures which parts are secretly deterministic, extracts them into verified programs or distilled specialists, and emits cognition binaries: WebAssembly artifacts whose manifests carry measured guarantees and whose declared capabilities are physically enforced by the sandbox. A tiered runtime executes compiled behavior behind conformally calibrated guards; guard trips deopt to the reference agent, and the captured trace recompiles back down, so nothing is figured out twice. We use "AGI compiler" in one narrow, testable sense: a system that autonomously converts novel experience into permanent, verified, near-free skill while measuring what it does not know. On AUTO-BENCH, a benchmark we introduce and pre-register, 87.1% of 560 recorded frontier-agent spans are witnessed-deterministic (three of the four censused task families measure 100.0%). On a 300-item stream with three scheduled distribution shifts, the closed loop compiles three artifact generations and drives marginal cost from 59 to 2 micro-dollars per item (6.4x end-to-end) at 96.9% parity on witnessed inputs with zero errors. The same stream also quantifies the failure modes: a loose guard silently mislabels 48.9% of compiled answers, and an unfaithful deopt reference causes the verification gate to refuse recompilation. Calibration and reference fidelity, not model capability, decide whether cheap stays correct. Code: https://github.com/RightNow-AI/auto

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.HCcs.LG2026-07-19

Teach it to stop, not just to click

Barada Sahu, Shivesh Pandey

Agentic computer-use RL is reported in single runs, and those numbers mislead. Using verifier-guided repair of a 35B computer-use agent (CUA) across five oracle-graded environments, we show a repaired policy's success rate is dominated by upstream variance: a variance-components…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LGcs.PL2026-07-17

AoA: Theorem Proving Agent over Abstract Syntax Tree of Redesigned Language

Qiyuan Xu, Joshua Ong Jun Leang, Renxi Wang, Wenda Li, Haonan Li, Luke Ong, et al.

Interactive theorem proving (ITP) underpins program verification and formalized mathematics, but its manual effort limits scalability. LLM-based proof agents promise to ease this effort, but their heavy token consumption and API cost remain a major obstacle. We trace this cost to…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LGcs.PF2026-07-16

AEVAL: From Anecdotal to Deterministic Testing for Agentic Skill Workflows

Tejas Singh Anand, Yuet Ying Christina Wang, Wanting Jiang, Steve Masson, Tian Zheng, Bingjie Zhou

Modern agentic systems increasingly rely on skills: installable packages of natural language and code that teach an LLM agent to perform a domain task. As skill repositories grow, developers need automated quality signals on every change, yet evaluation today is largely anecdotal…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CRcs.IRcs.LG2026-07-18

How Do You Choose Your AI Component? An Interview Study of Secure AI Integration in Practice

Mahzabin Tamanna, Elizabeth Lin, Sparsha Gowda, Laurie Williams, Dominik Wermke

The increasing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) as AI components in modern software systems introduces distinct security risks to the software supply chain. While many considerations and safety mechanisms are in place for components of the traditional software supply chai…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-15

NexForge: Scaling Agent Capabilities through Requirement-Driven Task Synthesis for LLMs

Jiarong Zhao, Zhikai Lei, Zhiheng Xi, Rui Zheng, Hang Yan, Jie Zhou, et al.

Scaling executable agent training data for LLM post-training is bottlenecked by substrate-bound methods that tie task generation to predefined tools, repositories, or skill graphs: expanding coverage requires manual substrate engineering, each new domain demands a bespoke pipelin…

View free PDFSource page