CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-11

Beyond Euclidean Clipping: Overcoming Exploration Collapse in LLM RL via Riemannian Isometric Policy Optimization

Zhicheng Cai, Xinyuan Guo, Hanlin Wu, Mingxuan Wang, Wei-Ying Ma, Ya-Qin Zhang, Hao Zhou

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a dominant paradigm for enhancing LLMs' reasoning capabilities. However, RL algorithms with PPO-Clip are inherently limited by exploration collapse. Subsequent works remain primarily heuristic and fail to identify the essential cause of PPO-Clip's failure. This work reveals the fundamental flaw of PPO-Clip: it implicitly measures policy discrepancy using Euclidean metric, which is theoretically inconsistent with the intrinsic geometry on the policy Riemannian manifold. This geometric mismatch results in overly conservative updates in low-probability regions while aggressive in high-probability regions, ultimately collapsing exploration. To correct this geometric flaw, we propose Riemannian Isometric Policy Optimization (RIPO), which guarantees isometric policy updates on the Riemannian manifold, effectively balancing exploration and exploitation. We further show that RIPO achieves a favorable bias-variance trade-off, which stabilizes optimization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RIPO significantly surpasses existing LLM RL algorithms across seven competition-level benchmarks (up to 60% improvement over GRPO on AIME24).

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-11

ARMOR: Stabilizing On-Policy LLM RL with Off-Policy Anchor Samples

Kexin Huang, Junkang Wu, Jinda Lu, Shuo Yang, Chiyu Ma, Jiancan Wu, et al.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet the training process remains notoriously fragile. In this work, we investigate a critical source of this instability: over-optimization, where models exploit tra…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-16

Beyond Entropy: Correctness-Aware Advantage Shaping via Contrastive Policy Optimization

Weiwen Xu, Jia Liu, Hou Pong Chan, Long Li, Deng Cai, Min Chen, et al.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) commonly uses entropy for advantage shaping. However, entropy cannot distinguish useful uncertainty from detrimental confusion, limiting its effectiveness as a correctness signal. We propose Contrastive Policy Optimization (CP…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-03

ACPO: Adaptive Credit Policy Optimization via Fine-Grained Surrogate Entropy

Zijun Xie, Yuyang You, Yongzhi Li, Enlei Gong, Zeyu Chen, Quan Chen, et al.

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has substantially improved the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), but sparse outcome rewards still make token-level credit assignment difficult. Existing scalable RL methods typically assign trajectory-level rewards uniformly across tok…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-22

Co-Evolving LLM Evaluators and Policies via DynamicRubric

Beining Wang, Weihang Su, Hongtao Tian, Hao Kong, Tao Yang, Ting Yao, et al.

Post-training with evaluator feedback on policy-induced samples serves as a major mechanism for improving large language models. As policies improve, these sampled responses become close in quality. These close candidates create a bottleneck for policy optimization: collapsed rel…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-20

Enhancing Rubric-based RL via Self-Distillation

Mingxuan Xia, Yuhang Yang, Chao Ye, Shuai Zhu, Shenzhi Yang, Guangcheng Zhu, et al.

Rubric-based RL has recently shown promise in improving LLMs on open-ended tasks. A widely recognized limitation of rubric-based RL is limited exploration: criteria that no rollout manages to satisfy (Unexplored Criteria, UC) receive no optimization signal. Recent methods address…

View free PDFSource page