CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIstat.ME2026-07-23

Detecting LLM-Generated Tokens in Human--LLM Coauthored Text

Yangjun Lu, Hongyi Zhou, Fabian Spill, Kai Ye, Chengchun Shi, Jin Zhu

The rise of human-AI collaborative writing has created a growing need for fine-grained detection methods that support localizing likely LLM-generated content in mixed-authorship documents. Existing methods for detecting LLM-generated text mainly focus on document-level classification and cannot identify which parts of the text are generated by LLMs. This paper introduces a new method to address this urgent need. Our method operates at the token level, the natural unit of modern language models, and builds on existing token-level detection scores. The key idea is to smooth adjacent token scores to reduce their variability, while using an adaptive Lepski-type rule to select the bandwidth according to the local authorship structure. Our method is simple to implement and does not require token-level labeled data for training. Theoretically, we characterize this trade-off and show that the proposed method achieves favorable mean square error performance in estimating the underlying signal. Empirically, we demonstrate strong performance of our method against a wide range of baselines in both synthetic datasets and a realistic dataset. We deploy a publicly accessible website that implements the methods as well.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivstat.MEcs.AIecon.EM2026-07-24

Interventional Score Geometry for Causal Inference

Mojtaba Eslami

Let $p(x)$ be the joint density of variables $X$, and let $ψ(x)=\nabla_x\log p(x)$ be its score field. Geometry constructed from $p$ and $ψ$ alone cannot identify causal direction: structural models with the same observational distribution have the same score geometry. I develop…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CLcs.AI2026-07-31

ARB: A Matched Authorship-Rewriting Benchmark Dataset for AI-Text Detector Evaluation

Gaetano Perrone, Simon Pietro Romano

Standard AI-text detection benchmarks compare human-written text against text generated directly by large language models (LLMs). While prior work has shown that rewriting and paraphrasing can degrade detector performance, it remains unclear whether performance measured on this c…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-24

Industrial Tokenization for LLM-Based Health Intelligence: A Federated Architecture for Industrial Evidence Integration

Deshui Li, Xiao-Ming Yuan, Zishun Wang

Industrial health management increasingly relies on heterogeneous information sources, including condition monitoring systems, supervisory control and data acquisition systems, maintenance records, inspection results, and prognostic models. Although large language models provide…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-31

MoRAE: Flow-Friendly Self-Supervised Latents for Text-to-Motion Generation

Yifei Zhu, Mingyi Shi, Yangyang Cai, Miao Cheng, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Taku Komura

Text-to-motion generation must produce motions that are semantically correct, temporally coherent, and physically plausible. A natural approach is to first project motion data into a structured semantic space and then train a generative model within that space. Such a paradigm ha…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-23

Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers

Vasudha Bhatnagar, Purnima Bindal, Vikas Kumar, Raj Kumari Bahl

Zero-shot summarization using Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly advanced the abstractive summarization task by producing coherent and fluent summaries. However, underlying stochasticity of the large language models raises concerns about the stability and trustworthin…

View free PDFSource page