CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIcs.LOmath-phmath.AP2026-07-09

A Formalization of the Mean-Field Derivation of the Vlasov Equation

Joseph K. Miller

We formalize a research result in the Lean 4 proof assistant by having a mathematician direct an AI system, and frame the activity as a formalization game. The objective is to turn a LaTeX document into Lean. The game is won when the development compiles, contains no sorry, and a machine check shows the target theorems rest on Lean's foundational axioms alone. Reuse is a second check, by a definition we introduce: whether the development yields a self-contained layer of general mathematics the wider library could absorb. The case study is a complete, axiom-clean formalization of well-posedness for the nonlinear Vlasov equation via Dobrushin's mean-field route -- existence, uniqueness, the stability estimate and mean-field limit, and a short-window superposition principle (weak solutions are Lagrangian). The human's role was to direct, not to write proofs: to scope the definitions, steer the decompositions, and triage the library's gaps; the AI agent executed. The formalization certifies the proof of each statement as written; whether the written statement is the intended theorem stays the mathematician's judgment. The optimal-transport machinery that fell out of the build (in particular, properties of the Wasserstein-1 metric and the Kantorovich-Rubinstein duality theorem) separates into a self-contained layer that compiles against Mathlib alone: about a sixth of the development (49 of 299 declarations), behind a 22-declaration interface with no reverse dependency. The headline theorems ran in about a week, the full development in about a month. We report the quantitative claims as observations of one game, not as general laws. The game's rules name no particular system, so the methodological framing is meant to outlast the tools of any one run.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.CCcs.AIcs.DScs.LO2026-07-23

Representative Sets in Propositional Abduction

Johannes Schmidt, Mohamed Maizia, Victor Lagerkvist, Johannes K. Fichte

The propositional abduction problem is a well-known form of non-monotonic reasoning where we are asked to find an explanation of a given manifestation. Recently, there has been an influx of results asking more refined questions about the solution space rather than only individual…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LO2026-07-23

Differentiable Logic Programming to Mitigate Reasoning Shortcuts in Neurosymbolic Systems

Akihiro Takemura, Katsumi Inoue

Neurosymbolic (NeSy) systems integrate neural networks with logical reasoning to achieve both generalization and interpretability, but recent work has shown they are susceptible to shortcut reasoning behaviors. We propose a novel method using matrix-based differentiable logic pro…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LOcs.AIcs.SE2026-07-23

Encoding Event-B Proof Rules in Prolog: An Interactive Sequent Prover for ProB

Katharina Engels, Jan Gruteser, Michael Leuschel

Event-B is a formal method rooted in predicate logic and set theory. We encoded over 600 proof rules in Prolog, enabling a systematic, comprehensible proof analysis and construction. By integrating the proof rules into the Prolog-based validation tool ProB, we obtain an interacti…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LOcs.AIcs.GT2026-07-23

Animation, Verification and Visualisation of Prolog Transition Systems with ProB

Jan Gruteser, Michael Leuschel, Katharina Engels, Fabian Vu

ProB is a Prolog-based model checker, animator and constraint solver for high-level formal specifications. One can also use ProB to animate transition systems defined by Prolog predicates, allowing the application of its various validation techniques. In this work, we present the…

View free PDFSource page