CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.ROcs.CV2026-07-06

A Reliable Context-Aware and Temporal Planning Framework for Autonomous Driving

Argho Dey, Yunfei Yin, Swachha Ray, Md Minhazul Islam, Zheng Yuan, Sijing Xiong, Hongyu Liu, Zhiqiu Huang

Safe operation of autonomous vehicles in dense urban traffic depends on perception and planning that remain reliable when onboard sensing is degraded. In real driving conditions, camera observations are frequently corrupted by occlusion, motion blur, illumination change, and sensor noise, and when such degraded observations are aggregated indiscriminately over time, trajectory planning becomes unstable and collision risk rises for both the ego vehicle and surrounding road users. Recent Bird's-Eye-View (BEV) approaches unify perception and planning through a shared spatial representation, but most fuse temporal information across frames without assessing the reliability of the underlying observations. We present a Reliable Context-Aware and Temporal Planning framework for Autonomous Driving (RCT-AD) that explicitly models feature quality and temporal consistency to support safer, more consistent planning. A Reliable Context Awareness module scores per-frame reliability and selectively retains trustworthy features through a quality-gated First-In-Last-Out (FILO) memory mechanism, reconstructing degraded observations from reliable historical context so that corrupted inputs do not destabilize the scene representation. A Temporal Trajectory Planner captures long-term dependencies and multi-agent interactions to produce smoother, safety-aware trajectories, while a joint detection-and-segmentation head injects semantic and motion cues into the shared BEV space to strengthen scene understanding. Experiments on the nuScenes autonomous driving benchmark show that RCT-AD improves perception accuracy, motion prediction, and planning robustness over recent end-to-end baselines, achieving 61.5 nuScenes Detection Score, 52.9 mean Average Precision, and 52.3 mean Intersection over Union, while maintaining competitive computational efficiency suitable for real-time deployment.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.ROcs.CV2026-07-21

Cognitive Dual-Process Planning for Autonomous Driving with Structured Scene Knowledge and Verifiable Reasoning-Action Consistency

Zhongyao Yang, Haoyu Li, Yu Yan, Zhuangxuan Yu, Jiangfeng Nan, Jinrui Nan

High-level planning for autonomous driving is a knowledge-intensive engineering decision task that requires accurate scene understanding, timely inference, and internally consistent action selection. Vision-language models (VLMs) can make intermediate reasoning explicit, but thei…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.CVeess.SY2026-07-06

VLM-CASE: Vision-Language Model Enabled Context-Adaptive Safety Envelopes for Anticipatory Safe Autonomous Driving

Tianjia Yang, Ke Li, Ruwen Qin, Xianbiao Hu

Adverse driving conditions, such as bad weather, remain a principal barrier to autonomous driving because they degrade two things at once: what the vehicle can perceive and what it can physically do. Human drivers cope by anticipation, reasoning about the scene and re-budgeting s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.CV2026-07-11

PrismAD: Decoupled Planning via Semantic Mixture-of-Planners for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Kang Ding, Zhigui Lin, Hongsong Wang, Jie Gui, Qi Liu, Zhe Wang, et al.

This letter presents PrismAD, a decoupled end-to-end autonomous driving framework based on a Semantic Mixture-of-Planners. Existing planners usually aggregate heterogeneous scene tokens into a coupled representation space, forcing a single planning branch to jointly model agent i…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG2026-06-29

Learning from Mistakes: Rollout-Retrieval Lifelong Policy Learning for Autonomous Driving

Cheng Gong, Haoyang Wang, Chao Lu, Zirui Li, Jianwei Gong

Autonomous driving policies should be able to improve continually as deployment exposes them to increasingly diverse and long-tail traffic situations. However, most learning-based policies are trained or fine-tuned on expert demonstrations and then rely largely on generalization…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.CV2026-07-05

Agent-driven Long-tail Simulation for Autonomous Driving

Junru Gu, Lijin Yang, Jianing Huang, Shu Liu, Zhongzhan Huang, Hang Zhao

Evaluating autonomous driving systems in closed-loop settings requires realistic and interactive simulation, yet existing simulators largely rely on log replay or rule-based agents, limiting behavioral diversity and long-tail coverage. We propose an agent-driven simulation framew…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.RO2026-06-30

PriorEye: Geospatial Visual Priors for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Kyuhwan Yeon, Benjamin Ramtoula, Daniele De Martini

Most end-to-end autonomous driving methods rely solely on instantaneous sensor observations, limiting them to reactive behavior without the anticipatory foresight human drivers employ through prior experience. We introduce geospatial visual priors, street-level visual context anc…

View free PDFSource page