CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CV2026-06-30

Reasoning-aware Speculative Decoding for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models in Autonomous Driving

Anh Dung Dinh, Simon Khan, Flora Salim

Modern Vision-Language-Action (VLA) planners for autonomous driving emit a chain-of-causation (CoC) reasoning step \emph{before} producing a trajectory. The reasoning is autoregressive and dominates inference latency, while the trajectory head is parallel and cheap. Latency is an operational constraint in autonomous driving, so accelerating the reasoning step is the central problem we address. We observe that CoC reasoning has two qualitatively different needs: most tokens continue routine setup that follows naturally from the ego-trajectory history, and a small fraction encode commitments that require fresh visual evidence about an unexpected situation. We split this reasoning into two specialized paths: a \emph{routine reasoner} that handles the predictable continuation by attending to trajectory history, and a \emph{deliberative reasoner} (the unmodified VLA target) that handles novel cases by attending to current visual evidence, using the speculative decoding framework as the architectural template for how the two paths cooperate. Unlike standard speculative decoding, our routine reasoner is not a smaller replica of the target; the two reasoners are deliberately specialized to read different parts of the prompt. We propose two techniques to realize this. First, we introduce \textbf{FlatRoPE}, a 1D rotary positional embedding in the draft that breaks the rotational symmetry of the target's 3D M-RoPE, redirecting attention away from visual tokens and onto trajectory-history tokens. Second, we introduce \textbf{Action-aware RL (AARL)}, a post-training stage that uses an action-quality reward together with a static-reference KL anchor. Together, our two-reasoner system reduces the reasoning-step running time by approximately $4\times$ relative to the original Alpamayo planner.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.ROcs.CV2026-07-16

Xiaomi-Robotics-1: Scaling Vision-Language-Action Models with over 100K Hours of Real-World Trajectories

Xiaomi Robotics Team, Jun Guo, Piaopiao Jin, Jason Li, Peiyan Li, Yingyan Li, et al.

We present Xiaomi-Robotics-1, a foundational vision-language-action (VLA) model capable of (1) following diverse language instructions to perform a wide range of mobile manipulation tasks in unseen environments out-of-the-box, and (2) efficiently adapting to novel downstream task…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-21

MissingBench-Verified: Probing Vision-Language Models' Inability to Detect Missing Object Parts

Wenqi Marshall Guo, Qingyun Qian, Shiyu Zhou, Guoping Luo, Shan Du

Vision Language Models (VLMs) are well known for hallucinating non-existent objects in images. Objects with missing parts present a unique challenge for VLMs, stemming from both real-world knowledge bias and the scarcity of such images in training data. We present MissingBench-Ve…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CV2026-07-17

When Can Test-Time Adaptation Help Zero-Shot CT Vision-Language Models?

Ailar Mahdizadeh, Puria Azadi Moghadam, Xiangteng He, Leonid Sigal

3D CT vision-language models (VLMs) classify abnormalities from text prompts in a zero-shot manner, enabling cross-institution deployment where labels are scarce and clinical tasks shift faster than supervised models can be retrained. A real CT scan, however, typically contains s…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.CV2026-07-21

Cognitive Dual-Process Planning for Autonomous Driving with Structured Scene Knowledge and Verifiable Reasoning-Action Consistency

Zhongyao Yang, Haoyu Li, Yu Yan, Zhuangxuan Yu, Jiangfeng Nan, Jinrui Nan

High-level planning for autonomous driving is a knowledge-intensive engineering decision task that requires accurate scene understanding, timely inference, and internally consistent action selection. Vision-language models (VLMs) can make intermediate reasoning explicit, but thei…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AI2026-07-23

When Are Reasoning-Based Guardrails Not Efficient? ResponseGuard: A Fast Vision-Language Guard for Real-Time Moderation

Dongbin Na

A vision-language AI assistant returns its answer as a stream of generated tokens. Therefore, a safety guard that watches that answer has to keep up with the stream and stop a harmful reply before a user reads it. Recent vision-language guardrails instead generate a chain of thou…

View free PDFSource page