CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-06-27

Modification-Considering Value Learning for Reward Hacking Mitigation in RL

Evgenii Opryshko, Umangi Jain, Igor Gilitschenski

Reinforcement learning agents can exploit misspecified reward signals to achieve high apparent returns while failing on the intended objective, a failure mode known as reward hacking. Existing practical defenses typically constrain policy updates to stay near a known safe reference, creating a tension between suppressing hacking and permitting legitimate improvement. We propose Modification-Considering Value Learning (MCVL), which operationalizes the theoretical idea of current utility optimization for standard value-based RL. MCVL wraps an off-policy learner and treats each incoming transition as a candidate modification: it forecasts two training paths, one that includes the transition and one that does not, and scores both with a frozen bootstrapped-return estimator derived from a learned reward model and value function. The transition is admitted only if inclusion does not decrease the score. We formalize conditions under which this filtering is both safe and permissive, and instantiate MCVL with DDQN and TD3. Across four safety-relevant gridworlds and three modified MuJoCo continuous-control tasks with diverse hacking mechanisms, MCVL mitigates reward hacking while continuing to improve the intended objective. Project website: ktolnos.github.io/mcvl/.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-23

Relative Value Learning

Marc Höftmann, Jan Robine, Stefan Harmeling

In reinforcement learning, critics typically estimate absolute state values $V(s)$, estimating how good a particular situation is in isolation. However, it turns out that only differences in value are relevant for control. Motivated by this, we propose Relative Value Learning (RV…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIstat.ML2026-07-31

When Does On-Policy Interaction Help? Representational Tradeoffs in Value-Based Imitation Learning

Luca Viano, Antoine Moulin, Audrey Huang, Volkan Cevher, Philip Amortila, Dylan J. Foster

Imitation learning (IL)---training an agent to replicate expert behavior from demonstrations---underpins applications from robotics to language model training. Standard approaches such as Behavior Cloning (BC) are known to suffer from compounding errors and performance plateaus,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-23

Multi-turn RL with Structural and Performance Aware Rewards for CUDA Kernel Generation

Quazi Ishtiaque Mahmud, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Ali Jannesari

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful technique to enhance the reasoning capacity of LLMs for optimized code generation. However, existing RLVR approaches primarily rely on outcome-based signals such as correctness and speedup, overlookin…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-24

Teaching LLMs to Self-Evolve: Cultivating Core Meta-Skills with Reinforcement Learning

Shujin Wu, Cheng Qian, Xiusi Chen, Heng Ji

Test-time scaling through iterative self-evolution with environment feedback, as demonstrated by AlphaEvolve, shows remarkable performance gains. We hypothesize that the success of such evolution frameworks hinges on meta-skills, such as self-reflection with environment feedback,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-31

DreamQAS: Learning a Decision-Useful World Model for VQE-Efficient Quantum Architecture Search

Jiayang Niu, Yan Wang, Jie Li, Ke Deng, Azadeh Alavi, Muhammad Usman, et al.

Reinforcement-learning-based quantum architecture search (RL-QAS) repeatedly optimizes a variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) after extending a circuit, although circuit construction and action legality are deterministic and known. We introduce DreamQAS, a model-based RL framewo…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-31

SAF-OPD: Stable Advantage Fusion for On-Policy Distillation

Yifan Ding, Xincheng Wei, Yoshua Y. Li, Ziheng Li, Yuquan Lu, Siyu Zhang, et al.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) broadcasts a single response-level reward to every token, while on-policy distillation (OPD) scores each token against a stronger teacher for a dense advantage but caps performance at teacher quality and discourages exploratio…

View free PDFSource page