CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.HC2026-07-15

ExpressionCueLens: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Human-AI Companion Conversations on Social Media

Lynnette Hui Xian Ng, Yunze Xiao, Lionel Z. Wang, Weihao Xuan, Mona Diab

LLM-based AI companion agents are increasingly being perceived not only as tools but also as social companions. On social media, people recount conversations where these agents comfort, negotiate and assert boundaries, reflecting a growing attribution of human-like qualities. To profile how agency is perceived in human-AI (HAI) interactions, we introduce the ExpressionCueLens framework, which organizes linguistic, cognitive, behavioral and perceptual cues into ten categories of anthropomorphism expressions. We apply this framework to $\sim$3500 Reddit and XiaoHongShu posts that discuss HAI companionship. Through iterative expert annotation and LLM-assisted labeling, our cross-platform analysis indicates patterns consistent with the hypothesis that XiaoHongShu users use significantly more expressions of vulnerability and emotions, and more non-perceptual cues. Reddit users employ more perceptual cues with temporality and embodiment expressions. These findings suggest that cultural and platform norms shape the way that companion agents are treated as active, agentic partners, and provides design implications for culturally sensitive HAI companion agents.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.HC2026-07-08

Two-player Alternate Uses Test: A Controlled Testbed for Interactive Human-AI and Human-Human Co-Creation

Babak Hemmatian, Anita Keshmirian, Yijun Lin, Shravan Ramamoorthy, Maryam Jahadakbar, Eli Khuri-Reid, et al.

Controlled research on AI ideation typically compares independent agents, while field studies of human-AI collaboration sacrifice experimental control. We introduce a controlled, two-player extension of the Alternate Uses Test (AUT) that enables comparison of human-human and huma…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.HC2026-07-08

Learning social norms enhances compatibility in dynamic human-AI coordination

Yi Yang, Siyuan Liu, Xin Gao, Huamu Sun, Chao Liu, Qing Zhou, et al.

Humans continuously coordinate with others in dynamic interactions, often through implicit, hard-to-quantify social norms that act as shared tacit expectations among interacting agents. As AI agents, including large language models (LLMs), become embedded in daily life, they incr…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-16

Memory-Driven Self-Disclosure and Relational Turning Points: A Longitudinal Multimodal Study of Human-AI Interaction

Ryuichi Sumida, Mao Saeki, Masaki Eguchi, Sadahiro Yoshikawa, Koji Inoue, Tatsuya Kawahara, et al.

As conversational AI systems are designed for repeated use, a central question is how a series of interactions becomes a relationship. We present a longitudinal multimodal study of a memory-augmented conversational agent (24 participants x 10 sessions), in which participants rate…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-22

A Framework of User Experience Principles for Human-AI Agent Interaction in the Workplace

Kathrin Paimann, Elizangela Valarini, Sebastian Juhl

As AI agents become integral to business workflows, establishing guiding user experience (UX) principles is crucial for ensuring user trust and successful adoption. To address this, our study uses a multi-method approach - combining participatory design workshop, paper-and-pencil…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-08

Creativity from Friction: Human-AI Interaction for Exploratory Structural Design

Ricardo Maia Avelino, Rita Sevastjanova, Tom Van Mele, Philippe Block, Mennatallah El-Assady

AI agents that generate final answers based on user input often do not meet the needs of creative fields. Fields such as structural design and architecture need interactive systems that help users externalise and develop ideas, explore alternatives, and refine partial solutions.…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CEcs.HC2026-07-14

Networked Intelligence: Active Shared Context Graphs for Human-AI Team Science

Sutanay Choudhury, Jeffrey J. Czajka, Lummy M. O. Monteiro, Erin Bredeweg, Jason McDermott, Katherine Wolf, et al.

Most AI-for-science systems focus on scaling a single reasoning process by using better models, larger context windows, long-horizon agentic execution, or digital co-scientists working with one principal user. However, challenging scientific problems are rarely solved by one reas…

View free PDFSource page