CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-15

Experience Memory Graph: One-Shot Error Correction for Agents

Wenjun Wang, Yuchen Fang, Fengrui Liu, Zibo Liang, Kai Zheng

Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown remarkable capabilities in autonomous decision-making by generating sequential trajectories of states, actions, and observations. However, in complex, long-horizon tasks, these agents frequently suffer from compounding errors and struggle to recover from failures. Existing self-correction mechanisms rely on prompt-based reflection, which is inherently brittle, incurs heavy time and API costs due to iterative trial-and-error loops, and produces task-specific memory that may be hard to generalize to new scenarios. To address this, we propose Experience Memory Graph (EMG), a framework that reformulates agent failure recovery as a graph matching problem. At training time, we convert both failed exploration trajectories and successful expert trajectories into directed action decision graphs. By matching these graphs, we extract common subgraphs (successful workflows) and graph edit paths that explicitly indicate how to correct failures (e.g., which actions to add, delete, or relabel under a given observation), and store them in a memory graph with intra-task nodes and cross-task edges. At test time, EMG retrieves relevant insights and guides the agent in a single, loop-free execution. Experiments on ALFWorld and ScienceWorld show that EMG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art reflection baselines in success rate and average reward, while requiring no test-time trial-and-error.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.IR2026-07-23

Agentic Context Management: Solving Agent Memory and Cost by Treating Them as Lifecycle and Architecture Problems

Gaurav Dadhich

Production AI agents' failures are less often due to an inability to reason well and more often because they cannot manage what is in their reasoning context: conversation histories, large prompts, large tool definitions, and ballooning tool outputs. Agents drown in their own acc…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-23

AttriMem: Attribution-Guided Process Feedback for Agent Memory Learning

Qinfeng Li, Yuntai Bao, Xinyan Yu, Hongze Chen, Wenqi Zhang, Xuhong Zhang

Effective memory is crucial for LLM agents, yet constructing it effectively remains challenging. A memory-construction policy decides what information to extract, store, update, compress, or discard as interactions accumulate. Heuristic memory methods rely on subjective, task-spe…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-31

Beyond Retrieval: Analytic Memory for Multimodal Agents

Zhoujin Tian, Yao Tian, Hao Zhang, Cheng Chen, Yakun Li, Lei Zhang, et al.

Long-term multimodal memory must support not only retrieving relevant information but also computing over observations accumulated across interactions. Existing systems largely emphasize \emph{retrieval memory}, organizing interaction histories through summaries and indexes to re…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CRcs.AI2026-07-31

Memory Provenance Laundering in LLM Agents: A Non-Amplification Firewall for Persistent Memory

Jinghan Xu, Yiyong Xiao, Wanru Shao, Hankai Liu, Xinjin Li

Long-term memory lets large language model(LLM) agents reuse prior preferences and work flows, but it also turns untrusted observations into persistent action context. We identify memory provenance laundering: during LLM-based memory consolidation, an external observation may be…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.MAcs.SE2026-07-31

Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems

Fabio Orazio Mirto, Luca D'Agati, Giuseppe Tricomi, Stefano Silvestri, Francesco Longo, Antonio Puliafito, et al.

Agentic AI systems act through multi-step trajectories that combine planning, tool use, memory, interaction, and adaptation. This behavior stretches validation practice beyond component testing and one-shot input--output evaluation, because acceptable system behavior now depends…

View free PDFSource page