Generative Retrieval via Diffusion Transformer with Metric-Ordered Sequence Training and Hybrid-Policy Preference Optimization

Chenghao Liu, Yu Zhang, Zhongtao Jiang, Kun Xu, Zhenwei An, Renzhi Wang, Zhao Wang, Jiachen Zhang, Yuxiao Zhang, Kun Xu, Songfang Huang

Embedding-based retrieval ranks items by their similarity to a query in a shared vector space and usually aims to return the highest-scoring items. In many production settings this is not what is wanted: given a seed set that expresses a fine-grained pattern, one needs more items that both satisfy a target attribute and stay within that pattern. We formalize this as pattern-preserving attribute retrieval. The two goals pull against each other: averaging the seeds preserves the pattern but stays in a low-attribute region, while global attribute retrieval drifts to unrelated patterns. We approach the task with continuous generative retrieval, where a model reads a sequence of item embeddings and generates query embeddings for nearest-neighbor search. We propose MO-DiT+HPPO, a staged framework with raw-sequence pretraining, multi-domain metric-ordered continuation pretraining, tail-centroid fine-tuning, and HPPO. Metric-ordered training turns sparse online retrieval labels into in-pattern trajectories ordered from low to high predicted attribute density, teaching one model the metric-improvement direction across domains. HPPO aligns the generated query distribution with the true online objective by labeling a hybrid candidate pool with the online intersection metric and applying reference-anchored preference optimization. A Pareto pair filter keeps only winner pairs that do not lower same-pattern purity, raising the attribute metric without sacrificing the pattern. Across four attribute domains under item- and pattern-holdout protocols, metric-ordered DiT improves the intersection metric over a pretrained generative retriever, and HPPO improves it further, with significant gains on seven of eight domain-split cells and a marginal tie on the hardest split. Metric-predictor validation, order ablations, CPT/SFT comparisons, and a candidate-policy ablation show where the gains come from.