CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.CEcs.AImath.OCq-fin.PMq-fin.RM2026-07-10

Large-Scale Portfolio Optimization Problem Under Cardinality Constraint With Enhanced Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

Danial Ramezani, Mostafa Abouei Ardakan

Decision-making is posing an increasingly formidable challenge to investors because of the growing number of alternatives available in financial markets. A hot area of research over the past few decades has been portfolio optimization that seeks to determine how much an investor should invest in which asset. Introducing real-world conditions to the optimization model turns the problem into an NP-hard one for whose solution exact methods become inefficient; hence, researchers have turned to evolutionary algorithms to approximate solutions. In this paper, strengthening strategies are presented for multi-objective evolutionary algorithms that can provide a faster convergence rate and extensive search ability in the portfolio optimization problem under the cardinality constraint. To implement those features, a unique solution representation, a novel operator, and new repair mechanisms are introduced for solving the aforementioned problem in which lower and upper limits are set on the number of assets in the portfolio. For this purpose, new mating strategies along with the aforesaid package are implemented in well-known multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to solve the problem. The customized algorithms are subsequently tested against traditional ones using well-known market indices as benchmarks. Results indicate that the proposed strategy not only provides better approximations but also converges faster as well at no loss of performance with an increasing number of assets in the market.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivmath.OCcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML2026-07-24

Explicit Iteration Complexity of Exact Data-Driven Inverse Optimization for Integer Linear Programs

Akira Kitaoka

A data-driven inverse optimization problem (DDIOP) is the problem of estimating the objective-function parameters (weights) that explain observed optimal-solution data, and it arises in many applications, including integer linear programming (ILP). It is known that, by applying g…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AImath.OCstat.ML2026-07-23

A Defense of the Quadratic Model

Alexandru Meterez, Pranav Ajit Nair, Depen Morwani, Cengiz Pehlevan, Sham Kakade, Alex Damian

Due to the complexity of neural network loss landscapes, optimization theory is forced to rely on idealized models, and there is generally a tradeoff between how theoretically tractable the model is, and how accurately it describes the true optimization dynamics. In this work, we…

View free PDFSource page
arxivmath.OCcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-23

Barzilai-Borwein Fails Superlinear Convergence on an Open Set of Quadratics for Every Dimension $n\geq 4$

Dawei Li, Xiaotian Jiang, Mingyi Hong

Barzilai--Borwein (BB) method has shown strong practical performance in continuous optimization, yet its convergence dynamics remains poorly understood. In particular, a central unresolved question is whether BB converges superlinearly for almost every strictly convex quadratic p…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CEcs.ETstat.APstat.ML2026-07-23

Unsupervised Consensus-Based Anomaly Detection for Spatiotemporal Malaria Incidence in Ghana

T. Ansah-Narh, Y. Asare Afrane

A consensus anomaly detection framework was applied to monthly malaria surveillance data from Ghana (2014-2023) to identify atypical transmission patterns. Anomalies were highly structured in space and time. Ashanti and Northern Regions accounted for most recurrent anomalies, wit…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.RO2026-07-31

LEMUR: Learning to Align with Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning from Preference Feedback

Manith Adikari, Bei Peng, Samuele Vinanzi, Angelo Cangelosi

Reinforcement Learning (RL) systems are typically trained using a single, well-specified scalar reward function. However, real-world decision-making tasks often involve multiple, competing objectives, such as performance versus efficiency, where ground-truth reward functions are…

View free PDFSource page