CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-07-02

A$^{2}$utoLPBench: An Auto-Generated, Agent-Friendly LP Benchmark via Inverse-KKT Construction

Shuo Ren, Yaohui Han, Yifan Shi, Libo Shen, Haodong Lu, Dongfang Wu, Rongliang Fu, Bei Yu, Tsung-Yi Ho

Most LP-from-text benchmarks are static datasets of word problems written and labeled by hand. Once such a dataset is released, its size is fixed, its difficulty is fixed, and every problem can leak into the training data of future LLMs. We present \textbf{A$^{2}$utoLPBench}, a benchmark for testing LLM-driven agents on linear programming problems written in plain text. We first pick a feasible point and dual, then write down a problem for which that point is optimal and the objective value is known. The answer is known by construction, with no solver call and no human annotator. The evaluation environment bundles a reference solver-critic baseline and a Docker image whose usage instructions are written for an LLM-driven agent to read. With these in place, any agent can run the benchmark and get a calibrated score with one command. Because the benchmark is a generator rather than a fixed dataset, it has properties no fixed dataset can match: an unlimited supply of fresh problems, a difficulty knob set by $(n,m)$, ground-truth answers correct by construction, low LLM-side cost per problem relative to human authoring, repeatable scores across independent batches, and resistance to training-data leakage when fresh post-cutoff seed ranges are used.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AI2026-07-24

Do Agent Benchmarks Measure Capability? Protocol Validity in the Age of Agentic AI

Jiaqi Shao, Hanck Chen, Wei Zhang, Maxm Pan, Bing Luo

Agent benchmarks increasingly evaluate repository editing, web research, terminal use, and long-horizon interaction. Their scores support capability claims only when the evaluation protocol keeps the intended capability necessary for success. Recent reward-hacking benchmarks and…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-31

MAGA: Multi-Platform Self-Fusion of GUI Agents via Structured Action Distillation

Hang Yan, Zhangxuan GU, Beitong Zhou, Jiaxuan Chen, Runze Li, Yusong Hu, et al.

Graphical user interface (GUI) agents based on large language models are increasingly deployed across mobile, web, and desktop environments. However, existing agents are typically domain-specific, limiting the deployment and user experience. This motivates the consolidation of sp…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-31

AgentHPOBench: A Benchmark For Evaluating LLM Agents as Sequential Hyperparameter Optimizers

Tianyu Huai, Tingshuo Fan, Xinchi Chen, Yining Zheng, Yuxin Wang, Shuang Chen, et al.

As LLMs evolve from code completion systems into autonomous scientific agents, evaluating their ability to conduct experiments has become increasingly important. Existing benchmarks typically focus on static code generation, paper replication, or final answer correctness, but do…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CLcs.CV2026-07-23

GS-Agent: Creating 4D Physical Worlds With Generative Simulation

Hongxin Zhang, Chunru Lin, Junyan Li, Zhou Xian, Tsun-Hsuan Wang, Chuang Gan

Creating dynamic and physically realistic 4D worlds from natural language descriptions is both fascinating and challenging. Traditional computer graphics methods rely on manual creation, requiring extensive human effort to fine-tune materials, motions, and visual fidelity. Recent…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-31

From Code Review to Code Critique: Intent, Drift, and Spotlight for AI-Generated Diffs at Scale

Chandra Maddila, Mashrur Rashik, Euna Mehnaz Khan, Smriti Jha, James Saindon, Nachi Nagappan, et al.

AI coding agents are generating code at volumes that exceed the capacity of traditional peer review. At the same time, existing AI code review tools over-index on low-value suggestions such as style and best practices while under-indexing on the concerns human reviewers prioritiz…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.DBcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG2026-07-24

DBA-Bench: A Production-Fidelity Benchmark for LLM-Based Database Operations Agents

Junming Chen, Junyang Jiang, Xu Chen, Zibo Liang, Kai Zheng

LLM-based database agents show promise, but differing task scopes, testbeds, and metrics hinder comparison. We identify four gaps between evaluation and production operations: live-environment fidelity (multi-turn read-write interaction with a running database); observation-space…

View free PDFSource page