CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivq-bio.NCeess.SY2026-07-22

State-Dependent Observation Noise Reintroduces Epistemic Value in Linear-Gaussian Active Inference

Daniel Corva

Recent work established that under active inference, linear-Gaussian state-space models lose their epistemic drive (any incentive to act so as to gain information) "under any circumstances". The epistemic term of the Expected Free Energy becomes constant: the agent flattens to a Kalman filter whose gain sequence is fixed in advance, regardless of action. The minimal departure that restores the drive is unknown; the only established route is control entering the dynamics multiplicatively; the observation side of this boundary is unexplored. We show that state-dependent observation noise is such a departure: a covariance R(x) that varies with the state x, representing a sensor's accuracy degrading with range. The agent runs the standard first-order Gaussian filter of this literature, R evaluated at the predicted mean. Coupling R(x) to a controllable latent mean makes the posterior covariance, and hence the effective Kalman gain, depend on the action. Consequently, no fixed linear-Gaussian filter reproduces the agent and, under a mild rank condition on the observation map and a non-degeneracy condition on R(x), epistemic value is no longer constant; for scalar observations, reachable non-constancy alone is needed. This is a minimal constructive instance of the Bar-Shalom-Tse dual effect in the agent's maintained covariance: actions now influence the quality of future estimates, not merely the state. Our library cpomdp detects the incompatibility from model specification alone and raises a typed IncompatibleLinearizationError. The theorem ships with an executable witness: exhibiting any fixed filter that reproduced the agent's beliefs would refute both theorem and witness at once. Together this offers a precise, observation-side characterisation of curiosity in a Gaussian agent, bridging dual control and active inference.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxiveess.SYq-bio.NC2026-07-15

A modular state-space model of human perception, cognition, and decision dynamics

Sven Schoonebeek, Carlo Cenedese, Anahita Jamshidnejad

Human-centered adaptive systems require behavioral models that are both psychologically interpretable and mathematically analyzable. Many existing predictors either operate as black-box input-output mappings or provide limited access to latent internal dynamics. This paper addres…

View free PDFSource page
arxivmath.OCeess.SY2026-07-31

Admissible Set for Linear Systems under Linear State Constraints

Jean Lévine, Philipp Rumschinski, Franz Rußwurm, Stefan Streif

This paper presents a method for computing inner polytopic approximations of admissible sets for continuous-time linear control systems subject to affine state constraints. Building upon barrier theory and the explicit solution of linear systems, a structured sampling procedure i…

View free PDFSource page
arxiveess.SY2026-07-24

StateFormer: A Multivariate Transformer for Learning History-Dependent Battery State Dynamics and Long-Horizon Health Forecasting

Zhe Bai, Stephen Harris

This paper introduces a novel multivariate Transformer \emph{StateFormer} that forecasts degradation dynamics of large-scale battery systems. The model learns across time scales, from short-term thermal fluctuations to long-term aging trajectories, enabling accurate prediction of…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIeess.SY2026-07-23

When Is a Learned Command Adapter Worth It? Closed-Loop Identification and Counterfactual Auditing of Frozen Locomotion Policies

Zongtan Li

Adding a learned adapter to a frozen, command-conditioned locomotion policy is worthwhile only if the interface exposes improvements that are both real and recoverable from deployment-time observations. We introduce an adapter necessity audit that separates global operating-point…

View free PDFSource page