CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-01

Skills Are Not Islands: Measuring Dependency and Risk in Agent Skill Supply Chains

Changguo Jia, Tianqi Zhao, Runzhi He, Minghui Zhou

Agent skills package reusable operational knowledge for Large Language Model (LLM) agents, yet as they grow in scope, they become dependency-bearing artifacts whose identities, versions, and provenance remain implicit. This opacity already causes duplicated dependencies and inconsistent installations, exposing a gap that dependency management has yet to close. We introduce Agent Skill Supply Chains (ASSCs) to characterize mixed skill-package-service dependency graphs and help close this gap. Borrowing from Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs), we design SkillDepAnalyzer to capture natural-language dependency evidence and model skills as dependency-bearing artifacts. On the SKILL-DEP benchmark, SkillDepAnalyzer recovers skill metadata and dependency graphs accurately and comprehensively, substantially outperforming an LLM-based baseline and package-centric SBOM tools. Applying SkillDepAnalyzer to over 1.43 million skills, we obtain ASSCs and explore their structural diversity and security signals. We find four structural patterns: skill metadata is activation-ready but governance-poor; dependency graphs span skill, package, and service dependencies with concentrated reuse; recursive skill reuse expands dependency graphs and creates hidden package inventory; and skill dependency clusters form around related workflows. We also find that inspecting a skill alone misses security-relevant signals hiding in its dependencies. By analyzing ASSCs, we identify and report known malicious skills persisting in ASSCs to their developers. Based on these findings, we recommend typed dependency manifests, first-class dependency-cluster management, risk-warning audit commands for skill infrastructure maintainers, and lockfile-like records for skill developers.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.MAcs.SE2026-07-31

Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems

Fabio Orazio Mirto, Luca D'Agati, Giuseppe Tricomi, Stefano Silvestri, Francesco Longo, Antonio Puliafito, et al.

Agentic AI systems act through multi-step trajectories that combine planning, tool use, memory, interaction, and adaptation. This behavior stretches validation practice beyond component testing and one-shot input--output evaluation, because acceptable system behavior now depends…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-31

From Code Review to Code Critique: Intent, Drift, and Spotlight for AI-Generated Diffs at Scale

Chandra Maddila, Mashrur Rashik, Euna Mehnaz Khan, Smriti Jha, James Saindon, Nachi Nagappan, et al.

AI coding agents are generating code at volumes that exceed the capacity of traditional peer review. At the same time, existing AI code review tools over-index on low-value suggestions such as style and best practices while under-indexing on the concerns human reviewers prioritiz…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-30

To Add Is Machine, To Delete Is Human: Measuring and Mitigating Deletion Avoidance in LLM Code Editing

Amir M. Ebrahimi, Mohammed Mehedi Hasan, Aaditya Bhatia, Gopi Krishnan Rajbahadur, Ahmed E. Hassan

Large language models increasingly write and repair production code, yet evidence is mounting that their test-passing patches leave codebases harder to maintain. We identify one concrete source: deletion avoidance, the systematic tendency to retain code that an intended edit requ…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CRcs.SE2026-07-30

Old Tricks, New Models: How Simple Image Transformations Break Modern AI-based Content Moderation

Marco Alecci, Francesco Marchiori, Iyiola Emmanuel Olatunji, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Jacques Klein

While automated content-moderation systems have become essential for screening harmful content at scale, conventional task-specific classifiers often provide limited policy cov- erage and contextual understanding. Recently, commercial multimodal moderation APIs built on large fou…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-31

AgenticRepair: Multi-Faceted Program Context Engineering for Agentic Vulnerability Repair

Michael Fu, Qiyue Mei, Patanamon Thongtanunam, Kla Tantithamthavorn

Automated vulnerability repair aims to reduce the time and effort required to patch security flaws from a vulnerability triage report. Recent agentic AI approaches have shown promising results in automated program repair. However, vulnerability repair demands richer program conte…

View free PDFSource page