CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.NEcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-06Cited by 0

QDEvo: A Multi-Objective Quality-Diversity Framework for Automated Heuristic Design

Nam Do Khanh, Nhat Nguyen Tran Minh, Dat Pham Vu Tuan, Long Doan, Binh Huynh Thi Thanh

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) with evolutionary computation has emerged as a powerful paradigm for automated heuristic design in combinatorial optimization. However, existing approaches suffer from mode collapse, converging to homogeneous populations that lack semantic diversity and fail to explore the full algorithmic space. We propose Quality-Diversity Evolution (QDEvo), a multi-objective framework that integrates Quality-Diversity optimization with LLM-driven heuristic search, maintaining an unbounded archive of semantically diverse algorithms using pre-trained code embeddings and incorporating hierarchical self-reflection to guide the evolutionary process. Extensive experiments across standard benchmarks and real-world industrial applications demonstrate that QDEvo significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both Hypervolume and Inverted Generational Distance metrics. Our framework enables the discovery of heuristics that are simultaneously high-performing, computationally efficient, and semantically diverse, providing practitioners with a rich portfolio of solutions for complex optimization problems.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.ROcs.AIcs.CLcs.CV2026-07-23

GS-Agent: Creating 4D Physical Worlds With Generative Simulation

Hongxin Zhang, Chunru Lin, Junyan Li, Zhou Xian, Tsun-Hsuan Wang, Chuang Gan

Creating dynamic and physically realistic 4D worlds from natural language descriptions is both fascinating and challenging. Traditional computer graphics methods rely on manual creation, requiring extensive human effort to fine-tune materials, motions, and visual fidelity. Recent…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-23

OpenForgeRL: Train Harness-native Agents in Any Environment

Xiao Yu, Baolin Peng, Ruize Xu, Hao Zou, Qianhui Wu, Hao Cheng, et al.

Modern AI agents rely on elaborate inference harnesses such as Claude Code, Codex, and OpenClaw to drive multi-turn reasoning, tool use, and access to external systems. While powerful, these complex harnesses also make agents hard to train end-to-end with open infrastructure, who…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.ETcs.LGcs.MA2026-07-23

The Boundaries of Automation: A Theory of Persistent Human Participation

Fares Fourati, Hinrich Schütze, Eyke Hüllermeier, Iryna Gurevych

The rapid progress of AI has intensified the long-standing pursuit of automation: replacing human participation with algorithms wherever possible. Implicit in this pursuit is the assumption that humans remain in the loop only because current AI systems are not yet sufficiently ca…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-24

Teaching LLMs to Self-Evolve: Cultivating Core Meta-Skills with Reinforcement Learning

Shujin Wu, Cheng Qian, Xiusi Chen, Heng Ji

Test-time scaling through iterative self-evolution with environment feedback, as demonstrated by AlphaEvolve, shows remarkable performance gains. We hypothesize that the success of such evolution frameworks hinges on meta-skills, such as self-reflection with environment feedback,…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-23

Agentic coding without the cloud: evaluating open-weight large language models on longitudinal data preparation tasks

Mack Nixon, Liam Wright, Yevgeniya Kovalchuk, Alison Fang-Wei Wu, Martin Danka, Andy Boyd, et al.

Large language models (LLMs) and agents are now widely used tools in code development, with data typically sent to third-party cloud-based models. Their adoption in research using personal data is constrained by governance requirements that typically prohibit data transmission to…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.IRcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-31

RecHarness: A Bandit-Routed Agentic Harness for Self-Evolving Recommender Systems

Haoran Ling, Yuecheng Li, Zeyu Song, Jing Yao, Shuwen Kang, Chi Lu, et al.

Optimizing modern recommender models still depends heavily on engineers manually iterating over architectural, objective, and training-strategy changes. While LLM-based agents can automate this trial-and-error process, allowing the LLM to both select modification directions and g…

View free PDFSource page