CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-02

SkillCoach: Self-Evolving Rubrics for Evaluating and Enhancing Agentic Skill-Use

Jiayin Zhu, Kelong Mao, Yudong Guo, Dengbo He, Sulong Xu, Simiu Gu, Yutao Yue

Skills are becoming a reusable operational layer for LLM agents, encoding SOPs, domain rules, tool workflows, scripts, and validation routines. In realistic skill repositories, overlapping skills make reliable skill-use difficult. Final verifier success is too coarse for both evaluation and training, since an agent may pass through trial and error while selecting distractor skills, skipping required steps, composing workflows incorrectly or omitting final checks. We introduce SkillCoach, a self-evolving rubric framework for evaluating and enhancing agentic skill-use. SkillCoach derives skill-grounded process rubrics from real rollouts and evaluates trajectories along four dimensions: skill selection, skill following, skill composition, and skill-grounded reflection. It keeps the external verifier as a separate outcome signal, allowing process quality to be distinguished from accidental task success. The evolved rubrics further serve as process supervision for selecting high-quality training trajectories. Experiments show that evolved rubrics substantially improve evaluation quality, expose failures hidden by final accuracy, and provide stronger supervision signals than outcome-only filtering for enhancing agentic skill-use.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.MA2026-07-08

From Atomic Actions to Standard Operating Procedures: Iterative Tool Optimization for Self-Evolving LLM Agents

Haipeng Ding, Yuexiang Xie, Zhewei Wei, Yaliang Li, Bolin Ding

Tool utilization enables Large Language Model (LLM) agents to interact with the real world and resolve complex tasks. However, existing agent frameworks predominantly rely on static toolsets composed of granular atomic actions (e.g., basic file I/O or single-turn search), which f…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CL2026-07-01

Self-Evolving Agents with Anytime-Valid Certificates

Biswa Sengupta

Self-evolving agents violate the assumption behind most learning-theoretic guarantees: the data, evaluator, components, and hypothesis space are produced by the policy being updated. We present \textbf{SEA}, an architecture that confines self-modification to a small steering adap…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.GRcs.MA2026-07-17

Clarify Before Executing: A Self-Evolving Agent for Resolving Intent Asymmetry in 3D Tool Orchestration

Xiaoye Zhu, Weixin Li, Junan Huo, Bozhong Wang, Jia Zeng, Yi Yang, et al.

A fundamental intent asymmetry plagues modern 3D asset creation: while state-of-the-art 3D toolchains demand precise, executable parameters, ordinary users typically provide vague, underspecified instructions. Current 3D agents treat this ambiguity as noise, defaulting to blind e…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.CR2026-07-08

The Blind Curator: How a Biased Judge Silently Disables Skill Retirement in Self-Evolving Agents

Xing Zhang, Yanwei Cui, Guanghui Wang, Ziyuan Li, Wei Qiu, Bing Zhu, et al.

A self-evolving agent retires its bad skills by watching them fail, so what happens when the judge cannot see the failures? Skill retirement is the structural constraint that keeps a growing library from drifting below the no-skill baseline, but its guarantee assumes an unbiased…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.MA2026-07-14

Who Grades the Grader? Co-Evolving Evaluation Metrics and Skills for Self-Improving LLM Agents

Xing Zhang, Guanghui Wang, Yanwei Cui, Ziyuan Li, Wei Qiu, Bing Zhu, et al.

Self-evolving agent systems improve by creating, revising, and retiring their own skills, but every such loop rests on a hidden assumption: a reliable evaluation metric already exists. In many real applications it does not. We make three claims. First, metrics can be \emph{evolve…

View free PDFSource page