CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AI2026-06-26

Tandem Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

Difan Jiao, Raghav Singhal, Robert West, Ashton Anderson

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has significantly improved the reasoning capability of large language models, reaching expert or even superhuman performance in domains such as competition math. However, whether weaker agents and humans can actually harness this capability is far less certain, with RLVR documented to drift reasoning toward idiosyncratic patterns such as poor readability and language mixing. Tandem training is a recently introduced paradigm that targets this compatibility problem: a trained, stronger senior co-generates each rollout with a frozen, weaker junior, and the two are rewarded as a team, so the senior is pushed to reason in ways the junior can follow. Yet this paradigm has so far been demonstrated only in proof-of-concept settings, leaving open whether it scales to the long chains of thought of the modern RLVR pipeline. In this work, we propose Tandem Reinforcement Learning (TRL), which carries the tandem training paradigm into RLVR. In TRL, the senior and a frozen junior alternate stochastically to co-generate the reasoning, the resulting generation is rewarded, and the standard GRPO loss is applied to the senior. Training Qwen3-4B-Instruct on competition math, we find that TRL matches vanilla GRPO on solo reasoning capability while three properties emerge together from the same rollout structure: stronger handoff robustness with the junior, reduced distributional drift from the junior, and a chain-of-thought more legible to the junior. Our results demonstrate a promising route for RLVR with practical payoffs in multi-model communication and human compatibility.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AI2026-07-24

Learning as Reasoning Unfolds: Progressive Rollout Allocation for Efficient Reinforcement Learning

Heyang Jiang, Henry Liu, Baharan Mirzasoleiman

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a highly effective framework for improving LLM reasoning, with methods such as GRPO among its most successful instantiations. However, GRPO relies on repeated generation of long chain-of-thought rollouts. Traini…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.RO2026-07-31

LEMUR: Learning to Align with Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning from Preference Feedback

Manith Adikari, Bei Peng, Samuele Vinanzi, Angelo Cangelosi

Reinforcement Learning (RL) systems are typically trained using a single, well-specified scalar reward function. However, real-world decision-making tasks often involve multiple, competing objectives, such as performance versus efficiency, where ground-truth reward functions are…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-23

TOUR: A Trajectory-Level Unlearning Benchmark for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Chaofan Pan, Lingfei Ren, Xiangyu Jiang, Yanhua Li, Xuemei Cao, Xiangkun Wang, et al.

Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents are trained on fixed behavioral trajectories, which makes trajectory-level deletion important when selected data must be removed after training. Evaluating such deletion is difficult because a lower membership score can reflect trajector…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AI2026-07-24

Deconstructing Off-Policy Ratios: Entropy-Scaled Trust Regions for Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning

Guanqun Zhao, Zijun Xie, Binbin Zheng, Enlei Gong, Jiafeng Lu, Yehan Yang, et al.

Asynchronous reinforcement learning (RL) accelerates large language model (LLM) post-training by overlapping rollout generation with policy optimization, but the resulting stale, off-policy data can destabilize optimization and ultimately cause policy collapse. Existing methods t…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-23

Multi-turn RL with Structural and Performance Aware Rewards for CUDA Kernel Generation

Quazi Ishtiaque Mahmud, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Ali Jannesari

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful technique to enhance the reasoning capacity of LLMs for optimized code generation. However, existing RLVR approaches primarily rely on outcome-based signals such as correctness and speedup, overlookin…

View free PDFSource page