CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-17

Fantastic Adaptive Taxonomies and How to Use Them

Mert Cemri, Andrei Cojocaru, Melissa Pan, Shu Liu, Shubham Agarwal, Alexander Krentsel, Jay Tang, Kannan Ramchandran, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Matei Zaharia, Alex Dimakis, Ion Stoica

An agent system's execution traces record how it fails, and procedures that improve such a system without changing model weights (trajectory selection, prompt and workflow optimization, runtime monitoring) read these traces for feedback. Yet raw traces are a poor medium for accumulating that feedback: long, instance-specific, and lacking a stable vocabulary for recurring failures. We argue that an agent system should instead maintain an explicit representation of how it fails, induced from its own behavior and reusable wherever failure feedback is needed. AdaMAST builds this representation by converting a target system's traces into a compact, evidence-grounded failure taxonomy: named failure codes organized along three fixed axes (system-level, role-specific, and domain-specific), with every name, definition, and evidence pattern induced from the traces; no code is hand-authored, no trace human-annotated. The taxonomy is not merely a post-hoc diagnostic but a shared feedback interface, improving agents in three ways. In agent-system search, taxonomy-coded diagnoses of failed candidates outperform free-form reflection on all five benchmarks we test. At runtime, taxonomy feedback raises SWE-agent's resolution on SWE-bench Verified Mini from 60% with free-text reflection to 70%, and improves Claude Code from 64.0% to 70.7% as a runtime skill. In trajectory selection, AdaMAST-Judge, a verifier built on the induced codes, improves best-of-5 accuracy on Terminal-Bench 2.0 by 8-15 points over Pass@1. The vocabulary itself is compact (an order-of-magnitude compression that preserves trace distinctions), human-faithful (matching expert failure annotations more closely than a hand-crafted reference vocabulary), and adaptive (taxonomies induced for different domains share few codes). Adaptive failure taxonomies close the loop between the traces agents produce and the procedures that improve them.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.MAcs.SE2026-07-31

Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems

Fabio Orazio Mirto, Luca D'Agati, Giuseppe Tricomi, Stefano Silvestri, Francesco Longo, Antonio Puliafito, et al.

Agentic AI systems act through multi-step trajectories that combine planning, tool use, memory, interaction, and adaptation. This behavior stretches validation practice beyond component testing and one-shot input--output evaluation, because acceptable system behavior now depends…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.MA2026-07-30

Agentic Metaverse Services: A New As-a-Service Paradigm

Xiaofei Xu, Quan Z. Sheng, Zhongjie Wang, Boualem Benatallah, Xiao Wang, Ruipeng Han

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is reconstructing the digital virtual world, upgrading agents through enhancing their abilities in autonomous learning, multi-modal interaction, content generation, and collaborative decision-making. In particular, the shift from convers…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-30

From Textual Requirements to Microservice Architectures - A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM-Based Design Synthesis

Danyllo Albuquerque, José Renan, Guillermo Rodríguez, Guillermo Rodríguez, Emanuel Dantas, Ademar França, et al.

Microservice architectures have become dominant for modernizing monolithic systems, yet identifying appropriate services remains challenging and largely manual. Existing decomposition approaches are predominantly code-centric, limiting applicability in early design stages where o…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AIcs.CR2026-07-31

AgenticRepair: Multi-Faceted Program Context Engineering for Agentic Vulnerability Repair

Michael Fu, Qiyue Mei, Patanamon Thongtanunam, Kla Tantithamthavorn

Automated vulnerability repair aims to reduce the time and effort required to patch security flaws from a vulnerability triage report. Recent agentic AI approaches have shown promising results in automated program repair. However, vulnerability repair demands richer program conte…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.SEcs.AI2026-07-31

From Code Review to Code Critique: Intent, Drift, and Spotlight for AI-Generated Diffs at Scale

Chandra Maddila, Mashrur Rashik, Euna Mehnaz Khan, Smriti Jha, James Saindon, Nachi Nagappan, et al.

AI coding agents are generating code at volumes that exceed the capacity of traditional peer review. At the same time, existing AI code review tools over-index on low-value suggestions such as style and best practices while under-indexing on the concerns human reviewers prioritiz…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CRcs.SE2026-07-30

Old Tricks, New Models: How Simple Image Transformations Break Modern AI-based Content Moderation

Marco Alecci, Francesco Marchiori, Iyiola Emmanuel Olatunji, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Jacques Klein

While automated content-moderation systems have become essential for screening harmful content at scale, conventional task-specific classifiers often provide limited policy cov- erage and contextual understanding. Recently, commercial multimodal moderation APIs built on large fou…

View free PDFSource page