CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.LGcs.AIcs.CG2026-06-28

Invariant Reasoning Directions in Latent Trajectories of Language Models

Arun Vignesh Malarkkan, Manan Roy Choudhury, Utkarsh Byahut, Yash Ravindra Charde, Vivek Gupta, Yanjie Fu

Latent reasoning models perform multi-step inference directly in hidden-state space, yet the structure of these latent reasoning trajectories remains poorly understood. We show that contrastive refinement signals between stronger and weaker reasoning trajectories exhibit a highly concentrated low-rank structure, while unconstrained latent updates remain sensitive to paraphrases, checkpoint choice, and trajectory perturbations. These observations suggest that latent reasoning trajectories contain stable invariant directions mixed with unstable instance-specific variation. We introduce \textbf{Trajectory-Invariant Latent Refinement (TILR)}, a training-free intervention framework for identifying and manipulating stable reasoning directions in latent space. TILR first learns a low-rank invariant subspace from contrastive trajectory differences across inputs, then constrains latent interventions to this subspace while suppressing poorly aligned updates through an adaptive alignment gate. Across six reasoning benchmarks, we find that a small number of latent directions explain most variation between strong and weak reasoning trajectories. Interventions on these directions causally improve reasoning consistency and reduce trajectory instability under paraphrases and perturbations. TILR improves answer consistency under paraphrase by ~10% and reduces latent trajectory variance by up to $50\%$ while preserving reasoning accuracy. These results support a geometric view of latent reasoning in which transferable reasoning behavior emerges from stable low-dimensional structure within hidden-state trajectories.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-24

Reasoning Denoiser: Denoising Reasoning Traces for Hallucination Detection in Large Reasoning Models

Junlin Fang, Do Nguyen-Thanh, Xiaogang Xu, Zhen Fang, Sean Du

Large reasoning models (LRMs) generate long reasoning traces before producing final answers. While these traces may contain useful signals for hallucination detection, harnessing them is non-trivial because long trajectories often include noisy steps that obscure the cues relevan…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.LGcs.AI2026-07-31

MOT-SR: Multi-Objective Tool-Augmented Scientific Equation Discovery with Large Language Models

Boxiao Wang, Runxiang Wang, Kai Li, Chongming Li, Zhiwei Chen, Yifan Zhang, et al.

Symbolic Regression (SR) aims to discover analytical equations from observational data and plays a central role in scientific modeling. While recent Large Language Model (LLM) based approaches show promise, they face two limitations. First, they lack data analysis mechanisms for…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-24

Industrial Tokenization for LLM-Based Health Intelligence: A Federated Architecture for Industrial Evidence Integration

Deshui Li, Xiao-Ming Yuan, Zishun Wang

Industrial health management increasingly relies on heterogeneous information sources, including condition monitoring systems, supervisory control and data acquisition systems, maintenance records, inspection results, and prognostic models. Although large language models provide…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-31

DungeonBench: A Benchmark for Rules-Rich Tactical Reasoning in Dungeons & Dragons Combat

Ismayil Ismayilov, Atakan Kara, Kaan Oktay

Games and simulators make valuable benchmarks by turning decisions into measurable outcomes, but many current suites under-test rules-rich tactical reasoning: the ability to choose well when geometry, timing, resources, objectives, and rule interactions all matter at once. We int…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.MLcs.AIcs.LGecon.EM2026-07-24

CausalForge: A Formally Grounded, Self-Improving Agentic Framework for Automated Research in Causal Inference

Jiyuan Tan, Vasilis Syrgkanis

Automating theoretical research is constrained not only by the generation of candidate results, but also by their reliable evaluation. A common approach is to close the research loop with a large language model (LLM) reviewer. However, such reviewers remain empirically unreliable…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.CVcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-23

3D-Aware VLMs with Implicit and Explicit Geometries

Wenhao Li, Xueying Jiang, Quanhao Qian, Deli Zhao, Ran Xu, Shijian Lu, et al.

Despite rapid progress, most existing vision-language models (VLMs) built from 2D visual inputs often struggle when handling various 3D tasks that require fine-grained spatial understanding and reasoning. To bridge this gap, we present VLM-IE3D, a unified framework that enhances…

View free PDFSource page