CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.AIstat.AP2026-06-27

Primary ICD Category Prediction using LLM-based Probing

Chengyuan Liu, Xinyue Zhang, Yao Li, Guanting Chen

Objective: ICD codes are central to reimbursement, research, and population health surveillance, yet automated coding systems often struggle to integrate diagnostic signals from both clinical narratives and structured electronic health record (EHR) variables. We evaluated whether frozen medical large language model (LLM) representations can serve as a shared embedding space for multimodal primary diagnosis category prediction. Materials and Methods: We constructed a MIMIC-IV cohort of 13,645 admissions from the 10 most frequent primary ICD-10 codes, consolidated into seven categories. Structured variables were serialized into clinical narratives and combined with leakage-pruned discharge notes. Using a frozen MedFound-Llama3-8B-finetuned backbone, we extracted hidden states from five transformer layers and trained linear probes for structured-only, unstructured-only, and combined inputs, comparing against XGBoost and information-matched PLM-ICD baselines and evaluating MIMIC-III adaptation with a compact bottleneck adapter. Results: The combined probe performed best on MIMIC-IV (87.69% strict; 91.45% medical accuracy), exceeding both single-modality probes and baselines. The structured-only probe outperformed its standard baseline by 6.19 points in medical accuracy. Diagnostic information became increasingly linearly separable in deeper layers, and a 2M-parameter adapter restored cross-dataset transfer to MIMIC-III using only 5% of target labels. Discussion: LLM embeddings can unify structured and narrative EHR information for multimodal diagnosis prediction, supporting efficient reuse of clinical representations across modalities and datasets through a small representation-level module. Conclusion: Multimodal probing of frozen medical LLM representations provides a practical approach for studying EHR modalities and adapting clinical representations across datasets.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.HCcs.AIcs.ETstat.AP2026-07-07

Digital Fragmentation and Generative AI Use Across 103 Million Application Events

Sumer S. Vaid, Ashley V. Whillans

Knowledge workers switch between applications thousands of times per day, spending nearly a tenth of the work year transitioning between digital applications in a process called digital fragmentation. Whether this fragmentation reflects who an employee is, where they work, or wha…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.APcs.AIcs.LG2026-07-18

Optimizing Clinical Trial Protocols Using EHR-Derived Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Xiaodi Li, Munhuwan Lee, Pengyang Li, Xiaoke Liu, Jose K. James, Patricia A. Pellikka, et al.

Traditional randomized trials often obscure clinically meaningful heterogeneity in treatment response by focusing on average effects. Leveraging real-world data to emulate clinical trials and estimate heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) offers a promising path toward more prec…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIq-bio.QMstat.AP2026-06-27

Expert Evaluation of Clinical AI Tools on Real Point-of-Care Clinical Queries

Jean Feng, Vishal Patel, Patrick Heagerty, Yifan Mai, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Patrick Vossler, et al.

Physicians now pose millions of clinical questions to AI tools each week, yet these tools are evaluated largely on hypothetical or exam-style questions, not those actually asked in practice. We report a blinded evaluation built on 620 Real-world Point-Of-Care Queries (Real-POCQi)…

View free PDFSource page
arxivstat.APcs.AIcs.IR2026-07-11

From Stochastic to Stable: Rank Stability and Structural Sufficiency in AI Visibility Measurement

Ronald Sielinski

AI visibility measurement is comparative: practitioners want to know which domains generative search engines cite most often and whether observed differences are large enough to support decisions. Yet the industry lacks a principled way to determine whether enough data has been c…

View free PDFSource page