CORTEXA
← Browse
crossrefWater2025-09-17Cited by 4

SPI-Informed Drought Forecasts Integrating Advanced Signal Decomposition and Machine Learning Models

Anwar Ali Aldhafeeri, Mumtaz Ali, Mohsin Khan, Abdulhaleem H. Labban

Drought is an extremely terrifying environmental calamity, causing declining agricultural production, escalating food prices, water scarcity, soil erosion, increased wildfire risks, and changes in ecosystem. Drought data is noisy and poses challenges to accurate forecasts due to it being nonstationary and non-linear. This research aims to construct a contemporary and novel approach termed as TVFEMD-GPR, crossbreeding time varying filter-based empirical mode decomposition (TVFEMD) and gaussian process regression (GPR), to model multi-scaler standardized precipitation index (SPI) to forecast droughts. At first, the statistically significant lags at (t − 1) were computed via partial auto-correlation function (PACF). In the second step, the TVFEMD splits the (t − 1) lag into several factors named as intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) and residual components. The third step is the final step, where the GPR model took the IMFs and residual as input predictors to forecast one-month SPI (SPI1), three-months SPI (SPI3), six-months SPI (SPI6), and twelve-months SPI1 (SPI12) for Mackay and Springfield stations in Australia. To benchmark the new TVFEMD-GPR model, the long short-term memory (LSTM), boosted regression tree (BRT), and cascaded forward neural network (CFNN) were also developed to assess their accuracy in drought forecasting. Moreover, the TVFEMD was integrated to create TVFEMD-LSTM, TVFEMD-BRT, and TVFEMD-CFNN models to forecast multi-scaler SPI where the TVFEMD-GPR surpassed all comparable models in both stations. The outcomes proved that the TVFEMD-GPR outperformed comparable models by acquiring ENS = 0.5054, IA = 0.8082, U95% = 1.8943 (SPI1), ENS = 0.6564, IA = 0.8893, U95% = 1.5745(SPI3), ENS = 0.8237, IA = 0.9502, U95% = 1.1123 (SPI6), and ENS = 0.9285, IA = 0.9813, U95% = 0.7228 (SPI12) for Mackay Station. For Station 2 (Springfield), the TVFEMD-GPR obtained these metrics as ENS = 0.5192, IA = 0.8182, U95% = 1.9100 (SPI1), ENS = 0.6716, IA = 0.8953, U95% = 1.5163 (SPI3), ENS = 0.8289, IA = 0.9534, U95% = 1.1296 (SPI6), and ENS = 0.9311, IA = 0.9829, and U95% = 0.7695 (SPI12). The research exhibits the practicality of the TVFEMD-GPR model to anticipate drought events, minimize their impacts, and implement timely mitigation strategies. Moreover, the TVFEMD-GPR can assist in early warning systems, better water management, and reducing economic losses.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

crossrefWater2026-04-14

Benchmarking Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Groundwater Level Prediction in Karst Aquifers: The Dominant Role of Hydrogeological Complexity

Qingmin Zhu, Yinxia Zhu, Jie Niu, Jinqiang Huang, Fen Huang, Xiangyang Zhou, et al.

Karst aquifers present unique challenges for groundwater level prediction due to their dual-porosity structures and highly nonlinear hydrological responses. This study systematically evaluates nine machine learning and deep learning models (RF, XGBoost, LSTM, CNN, Transformer, N-…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2025-05-09Cited by 7

An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Forecasting Lake Water Equivalent Using Satellite Data: A 20-Year Analysis of the Urmia Lake Basin

Sara Habibi, Saeed Tasouji Hassanpour

This study presents an explainable machine learning framework to forecast groundwater storage dynamics, quantified as the Lake Water Equivalent (LWE), in the Urmia Lake Basin from 2003 to 2023. Satellite-based observations (GRACE, GLDAS) and climatic variables were integrated to…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2025-09-10Cited by 6

Deep Signals: Enhancing Bottom Temperature Predictions in Norway’s Mjøsa Lake Through VMD- and EMD-Boosted Machine Learning Models

Sertac Oruc, Mehmet Ali Hınıs, Zeliha Selek, Türker Tuğrul

In this study, we benchmark various machine learning techniques against a synthetic but physically based reference time series (model-simulated (ERA5-Land/FLake) bottom-temperature series) and assess whether decomposition methods (VMD and EMD) improve forecast accuracy using Supp…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2025-09-10Cited by 7

Combining Machine Learning Models and Satellite Data of an Extreme Flood Event for Flood Susceptibility Mapping

Nikos Tepetidis, Ioannis Benekos, Theano Iliopoulou, Panayiotis Dimitriadis, Demetris Koutsoyiannis

Machine learning techniques have been increasingly used in flood management worldwide to enhance the effectiveness of traditional methods for flood susceptibility mapping. Although these models have achieved higher accuracy than traditional ones, their application has not yet rea…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2024-05-26Cited by 3

Exploring Groundwater Quality Trends in Valliyar Sub-Basin, Kanniyakumari District, India through Advanced Machine Learning Techniques

Bhagavathi Krishnan Ramesh, Sankararajan Vanitha

The assessment of water quality assumes a position of utmost significance as it plays a critical role in upholding ecological balance and safeguarding the well-being of human populations. To achieve these goals, an in-depth consideration of water quality trends is essential, as i…

View free PDFSource page
crossrefWater2024-01-15Cited by 26

Comparative Analysis of Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory, Sparrow Search Algorithm-Backpropagation Neural Network, and Particle Swarm Optimization-Extreme Learning Machine Models for the Water Discharge of the Buzău River, Romania

Liu Zhen, Alina Bărbulescu

Modeling and forecasting the river flow is essential for the management of water resources. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of different models built for the monthly water discharge of the Buzău River (Romania), measured in the upper part of the riv…

View free PDFSource page