CORTEXA
← Browse
arxivcs.HC2026-07-10

Central Tendency Bias in Human Selection of AI-Generated Design Variations

Huiyang Chen, Keqing Jiao

Image-generation AI systems increasingly support creative work by producing multiple design variations for users to evaluate and select. In such human-AI co-creation workflows, selection becomes a critical stage where human judgment guides AI-generated possibilities toward final outcomes. While presenting multiple alternatives is intended to encourage exploration, the simultaneous multi-option presentation may introduce systematic biases in human decision making. Drawing on ensemble perception theory, we investigate whether these interfaces induce central tendency bias-the tendency to favor options closer to the center of a design set. We conducted a controlled experiment manipulating the variance of design sets (high vs. low) and measured participants' selections in both aesthetic preference and representativeness tasks. Results show that higher variance increases the selection of center-proximal designs across both tasks. These findings suggest that multi-variation interfaces in image-generation AI systems may constrain selection diversity, revealing a potential tension between diversity in generated outputs and diversity in human selection outcomes.

View free PDFSource page

Related papers

arxivcs.HCcs.AI2026-07-08

Creativity from Friction: Human-AI Interaction for Exploratory Structural Design

Ricardo Maia Avelino, Rita Sevastjanova, Tom Van Mele, Philippe Block, Mennatallah El-Assady

AI agents that generate final answers based on user input often do not meet the needs of creative fields. Fields such as structural design and architecture need interactive systems that help users externalise and develop ideas, explore alternatives, and refine partial solutions.…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.HC2026-07-08

Two-player Alternate Uses Test: A Controlled Testbed for Interactive Human-AI and Human-Human Co-Creation

Babak Hemmatian, Anita Keshmirian, Yijun Lin, Shravan Ramamoorthy, Maryam Jahadakbar, Eli Khuri-Reid, et al.

Controlled research on AI ideation typically compares independent agents, while field studies of human-AI collaboration sacrifice experimental control. We introduce a controlled, two-player extension of the Alternate Uses Test (AUT) that enables comparison of human-human and huma…

View free PDFSource page
arxivcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.HC2026-07-15

Measuring How Students Rely on Generative AI in Academic Writing: Development and Multi-Source Validation of the Generative AI Reliance Types Scale (GenAI-RTS)

Shahin Hossain, Tukhbita Afroz Nawmi

As generative AI (GenAI) becomes increasingly embedded in undergraduate academic writing, how students rely on these tools, rather than simply whether they use them, has become a central question for learning, academic integrity, and educational equity. Existing measures of relia…

View free PDFSource page